2008
DOI: 10.5422/fso/9780823227662.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lacan and the Limits of Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But such a situation, and the “totality” and “absoluteness” which it minorly allows, contrasts sharply with the formal meaning of “being” as total ( without remainder ) and absolute ( with respect to nothing whatsoever ). The existence of primal repression as coincident upon the existence of a subject of language therefore means that any such claim to formal and absolute totality in possible signification (which is the interpretation of “being” that α.b places upon us) is by its nature illusory (Shepherdson, 2008, pp. 18–28).…”
Section: Ontologizing As Autoerotic Fantasymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But such a situation, and the “totality” and “absoluteness” which it minorly allows, contrasts sharply with the formal meaning of “being” as total ( without remainder ) and absolute ( with respect to nothing whatsoever ). The existence of primal repression as coincident upon the existence of a subject of language therefore means that any such claim to formal and absolute totality in possible signification (which is the interpretation of “being” that α.b places upon us) is by its nature illusory (Shepherdson, 2008, pp. 18–28).…”
Section: Ontologizing As Autoerotic Fantasymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enrichment of metaphysics by its encounter with psychoanalysis is as well-attested (Badiou, 2015; Deleuze, 1994; Richardson, 1983b) as its delimitation by this same encounter is acknowledged (Boothby, 2014, pp. 185–221; Shepherdson, 2008, pp. 116–152).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Lacanian terms, our entry into the symbolic order of language as subjects brings the loss of our pre-subjective sense of oneness with the world and the purported enjoyment which accompanied that state (McGowan, 2013). Of course, as subjects, we never experienced this state because it was pre-subjective – prior to our formation as social beings of language and the law – and hence our positing of this enjoyment before and beyond language is, paradoxically, a retroversive consequence of our becoming subjects of language (Shepherdson, 2008). Yet we spend our lives seeking to recapture the intense enjoyment associated with this purportedly lost object, and it is the existential ‘lack’ associated with this loss that fuels the insatiability of desire – even as we misrecognise objects of pleasure as sources of enjoyment – whether it be for the latest smartphone, ‘taking back control’ (to quote the UK Brexiteers) or improved national outcomes in the Programme for International Student Assessment.…”
Section: A Note On Ideology Enjoyment and Fantasymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacques Lacan argued that the veridical content of a hallucination is far less important than the quality of the hallucination (Lacan, , p. 75). Notions of agreed upon common‐sense ‘reality’ for Lacan belong properly speaking to fantasy and are part of the domain of the Imaginary and the Symbolic which must be distinguished from a pre‐discursive Real (Shepherdson, , p. 32). In his seminar on the psychoses, Lacan () makes the point that it is only insofar as the hallucinations form part of a delusional belief system that they are considered to be positive symptoms of psychosis.…”
Section: Visionary Spiritual Experiences In Psychosis: Psychoanalyticmentioning
confidence: 99%