“…Species limits in the genus Labyrinthula have long been considered equivocal (Young 1943), and is reflected by three of 13 species considered doubtful, and another eight excluded as synonyms, or considered nomen nudum or of another family, in Dick's (2001) treatment of the group. Many studies (e.g., Olive 1975;Porter 1990;Muehlstein et al 1991), including the bionomic review by Pokorny (1967) express a major reliance on appearance in vitro including cell length, width, and shape, colony shape in liquid or agar, and color in mass; habitat, cell division, aggregation and zoospore production, speed, nuclear and cytoplasmic condition, ectoplasmic network descriptions, and other observations were also included variously. However, many of these traits commonly overlap among the species Pokorny (1967) discusses, and various isolates of the same putative type (or even subsamples of a given isolate) can vary in nearly all aspects of their appearance depending on age, nutrient sources, and the specific culture medium and conditions used (Watson 1957;Pokorny 1967;Muehlstein et al 1991;D.…”