1994
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.190.3.8115604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography.

Abstract: MR arthrography accurately shows the relationship of labral lesions to the origins of the glenohumeral ligaments and helps in distinction between stable and unstable lesions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
106
1
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
106
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging has been reported to identify labral pathology with sensitivities of 76% to 93% and specificities of 68% to 87%, magnetic resonance arthrography has been reported to have improved diagnostic results, with sensitivities ranging from 88% to 92% and specificities ranging from 92% to 93%. [24][25][26][27][28][29] When glenohumeral osseous deficiency is suspected, computed tomography (CT) scans are particularly helpful in determining the extent of glenoid and humeral bone loss in cases of instability. Compared with radiography, conventional CT, and magnetic resonance imaging, 3-dimensional CT has been shown to be the most reliable imaging modality for the quantification of glenoid and humeral bone loss and can be combined with arthrography to allow for simultaneous assessment of soft-tissue structures in addition to the osseous anatomy.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging has been reported to identify labral pathology with sensitivities of 76% to 93% and specificities of 68% to 87%, magnetic resonance arthrography has been reported to have improved diagnostic results, with sensitivities ranging from 88% to 92% and specificities ranging from 92% to 93%. [24][25][26][27][28][29] When glenohumeral osseous deficiency is suspected, computed tomography (CT) scans are particularly helpful in determining the extent of glenoid and humeral bone loss in cases of instability. Compared with radiography, conventional CT, and magnetic resonance imaging, 3-dimensional CT has been shown to be the most reliable imaging modality for the quantification of glenoid and humeral bone loss and can be combined with arthrography to allow for simultaneous assessment of soft-tissue structures in addition to the osseous anatomy.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI may also be augmented with the use of contrast, as in magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA). Studies have reported good sensitivities and specificities with these two modalities (6)(7)(8). Some studies have gone further to show the superiority of MRA over MRI in the diagnosis of labral tears (5,8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Partial tears are often misdiagnosed as normal variants. 10 Direct or indirect contrast enhancement is recommended for more differentiation. 9 Correct slice orientation is important for diagnosing rotator cuff tears.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%