Labour’s declining share of national income in Ireland and Denmark: the national specificities of structural change

Abstract

The share of national income going to workers has decreased steadily across Europe since the 1980s. This apparently uniform decrease in labour's share conceals differences amongst states however-in 'liberal' Ireland, this fall has been drastic, while that of 'social democratic' Denmark has been moderate. This article presents a parallel time series analysis of institutional and structural factors shaping labour's share in Ireland and Denmark. Our results show that factors common to the study of variation in labour's share operate in different ways in different countries, both in magnitude and causal mechanism. We find that stressors such as global trade, foreign investment and high-tech growth produce different effects in each location. Equally, protections such as unionization, leftist cabinets and welfare spending display contradictory effects in both locations. We conclude that 'power resource' models of labour share should be supplemented with comparative approaches that emphasize how institutionalized socio-political logics mediate returns to labour.

Financialisation, globalisation, and the industrial labour share: A comparison between Iran and Thailand

“…Jayadev (2007) and Stockhammer (2017) present evidence from multi-country panel data sets that capital account and trade openness have primarily reduced the wage shares of emerging economies since 1970. Similar econometric evidence for Korea, Mexico, Turkey, Finland, Denmark and Ireland is provided by Onaran (2009), Böckerman and Maliranta (2012) and Flaherty and Riain (2020).…”

“…The inclusion of both addresses the common autocorrelation issues of the standard stationary ordinary least squares (OLS) approach, especially when used for small macroeconomic samples. For this reason, an increasing number of empirical studies on the drivers of inequality employ the single-equation UECM approach (Bengtsson, 2014;Flaherty & Riain, 2020;Gouzoulis, 2021;Kristal, 2010). The standard structure of the UECM is as follows:…”

Market-Engaging Institutions: The Rule of Law, Resilience and Responsiveness in an Era of Institutional Flux

“…In particular Ireland used Social Partnership Programmes to negotiate wage restraints, public spending limits, and increase social inclusion (Ó'Riain 2000, p. 158). Between 1987 and 2008 there were six such Social Partnership agreements, each of which were the result of dialogue between employers and employees on the future of the Irish economy (Flaherty andÓ'Riain 2020, p. 1047). Consistency in economic policy when combined with Social Partnership Programmes further reduced the risk of regulatory inertia and state capture, meaning that the beneficial outcomes of public spending and EU funding were more evenly distributed.…”

The Political Economy of Inequality in Chile and Mexico: Two Tales of Neoliberalism

“…Despite political awareness of highincome inequality in South America, only a handful of research focuses on the region, while much of the literature is centred on advanced countries (e.g. Alvarez 2015, Wood 2017, Flaherty and Riain 2019. Rare exceptions are Arestis and Phelps (2019), Onaran (2009), Guschanski and Onaran (2017), and Ibarra and Ross (2019).…”

“…The UECM model is widely used in this literature, e.g., seeKristal (2010),Bengtsson (2014a), andFlaherty and Riain (2019). Our interest is targeted on the long-run coefficients, i.e., the long-term structural processes, rather than on the shortterm coefficients, i.e., the reactions to temporary shocks.3 As reported in the appendix, all variables are either I(0) or I(1).…”