Abstract:An increase in the number of PhD candidates in the last decades has changed the landscape of employment and the nature of what it means to be a PhD holder. Embarking on a career in academia is a challenging endeavour for early‐career researchers while they are confronted with a limited number of job opportunities in academia. Taking into account that knowledge based societies need highly skilled professionals beyond the academic environment, it is important to understand what is the role and value of a PhD for… Show more
“…A stronger and earlier focus on it could help young researchers to open their minds to a broader range of career pathways than the anticipated academic one. These skill sets, especially if combined, have the potential to improve the valuable utilisation of research skills of PhD graduates in various career paths, which they increasingly need to consider (Boman et al, 2021, Hnátková et al, 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is based on broadly understood ideas of Open Science (OS) and Open Innovation (OI), in which interdisciplinarity, teamwork and cooperation across institutions and between academia and other sectors are vital elements. It is a contribution to ongoing attempts to diversify doctoral education regarding the aims of the study, organisational forms and career outlooks of the graduates (Kosová et al, 2019, 26-40;Hnátková et al, 2022).…”
The study presents findings from the analysis of skills useful for Open Science (OS) and Open Innovation (OI). Employers both within and outside academia and employed PhD graduates and students in the Czech Republic, Ireland and Denmark were interviewed and job postings aimed at research vacancies were reviewed to identify key skillsets useful in broadly defined OS and OI environments. Five skill profiles of PhD graduates have been identified: (1) collaborative and interdisciplinary research, (2) practical applicability of research results, (3) involving the wider public in research, (4) use of Open Science tools and (5) career planning. Implications of the findings for possible interventions in PhD education systems are discussed.
“…A stronger and earlier focus on it could help young researchers to open their minds to a broader range of career pathways than the anticipated academic one. These skill sets, especially if combined, have the potential to improve the valuable utilisation of research skills of PhD graduates in various career paths, which they increasingly need to consider (Boman et al, 2021, Hnátková et al, 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study is based on broadly understood ideas of Open Science (OS) and Open Innovation (OI), in which interdisciplinarity, teamwork and cooperation across institutions and between academia and other sectors are vital elements. It is a contribution to ongoing attempts to diversify doctoral education regarding the aims of the study, organisational forms and career outlooks of the graduates (Kosová et al, 2019, 26-40;Hnátková et al, 2022).…”
The study presents findings from the analysis of skills useful for Open Science (OS) and Open Innovation (OI). Employers both within and outside academia and employed PhD graduates and students in the Czech Republic, Ireland and Denmark were interviewed and job postings aimed at research vacancies were reviewed to identify key skillsets useful in broadly defined OS and OI environments. Five skill profiles of PhD graduates have been identified: (1) collaborative and interdisciplinary research, (2) practical applicability of research results, (3) involving the wider public in research, (4) use of Open Science tools and (5) career planning. Implications of the findings for possible interventions in PhD education systems are discussed.
“…Since then, a positive relationship between intensity of R&D investment and the proportion of doctorates employed in NAPs has been consistently observed in Europe and the US (Beltramo et al., 2001). Globally, the US took the lead in providing NAPs for doctorates, while advanced economics in Europe, such as Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden, also performed well in absorbing doctorates beyond academia (Hnatkova et al., 2022). These geographic disparities in NAP provision could result in frequent occupational mobility among doctorates, who tended to migrate towards locales with more R&D investments and greater employment availability (Passaretta et al., 2019).…”
The globally expanding doctoral education and the diminishing availability of academic job opportunities have prompted an increasing proportion of PhD graduates to seek employment beyond academia, drawing a growing scholarly interest. However, the existing literature on doctoral career pathways tends to be fragmented and dispersed, given the idiosyncratic individual and educational characteristics of doctorates grappling with the complex structural factors. To depict a comprehensive picture of the diversifying employment trajectories of doctorates across various geographical, disciplinary and sectoral contexts, this study conducts a systematic review, scouring 831 pertinent journal articles from the Web of Science. Following a set of inclusion criteria, 31 papers were ultimately selected to identify the key factors shaping employment trajectories of PhD graduates at structural (national supply and demand), institutional (employers' perceptions) and individual (doctorates' characteristics) levels. Drawing on the boundaryless and value‐based career theories, the authors develop a four‐dimension analytical framework, within which the findings of the 31 papers in East Asian and Western contexts are analysed. Overall, stakeholders in Western systems generally recognise the trend of PhD graduates securing non‐academic employment, whereas East Asian nations appear less receptive to this agenda. Meanwhile, due to their strong emphasis on research skills utilisation and employment stability, PhD graduates in certain economies find it challenging to pursue satisfying and successful careers, warranting increased attention. Building on the findings, we propose a four‐quadrat model in an effort to provide a tool for evaluating the capacity to absorb doctoral workforces of specific systems by categorising the doctoral professions. Highlighting shared patterns observed across various higher education systems and distinct trends prevalent in specific economies, this paper addresses key topics in doctoral education and doctorate employment literature such as labour market conditions, employment outcomes, job satisfaction, skills (mis)matches and sustainable careers.
“…Additionally, more temporary jobs are created in academia, complicating the academic career trajectories of PhD graduates. Furthermore, the widespread coronavirus‐triggered side effects across the academic labour market have been a hindrance to PhD graduates' academic career choices and pathways over the last 3 years (2020–2023) (Atkinson et al, 2022; Hnatkova et al, 2022). Slowdowns or halts in academic hiring have become the ‘new normal’ in many nations, particularly those that rely primarily on tuition fees (like the United States and the United Kingdom), which puts a strain on academic career pathways, particularly for recent PhD graduates and junior academics (Xu, 2022).…”
Much of the scholarship on employment and career pathways of PhD graduates has examined the issues, including pre‐doctoral experiences, quality of doctoral education, networking and career choices across different sectors; however, contextual environmental factors have been generally overlooked. This study aims to explore the academic career choices and pathways of PhD graduates currently employed in universities in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) in China. The primary data sources include semi‐structured interviews with a group of 28 PhD graduates from 14 universities in Guangdong province and Hong Kong, government talent policy documents, and university documents regarding recruitment and tenure. The findings of this study revealed five strategic logics that the PhD graduates deployed in the dynamic decision‐making process for academic career choices and pathways in the GBA: (1) logic of academic alignment (matching degrees between academic competitiveness and academic job market, alignment in research/teaching agenda, alignment with future professional aspiration); (2) logic of financial concerns; (3) logic of academic network; (4) logic of risk mitigation; (5) logic of institutional culture. Implications for universities and policymakers on academic career support and talent management in the GBA are also provided.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.