2022
DOI: 10.1177/10353046221104506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labour market flexibilisation in Lithuania: Outcomes and impacts on gender differences in work arrangements

Abstract: This paper evaluates the impacts of 2017’s labour law liberalisation on labour market flexibility in Lithuania. While employment did grow rapidly in 2017–2019, there was little change in labour market flexibility. Against expectations, part-time employment declined as labour relations continued to be administered under path-dependent institutional inertia inherited from previous decades. The prevalence of full-time, dual-earner employment was shaped by the country’s socialist legacy and was reflected in high e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While domestic business interests did back the government's plans to rewrite labor laws, post-reform developments raise questions about their motives in seeking liberalization reforms. Contrary to expectations, in the first two post-reform years (2018–2019) the proportion of permanent contracts in the Lithuanian labor market continued to grow (albeit with the reduced protections that such contracts now provide), while contract work actually declined and the use of the new flexible forms of employment remained marginal (Juska and Navicke, 2022: 10–11). This suggests that business lobbying for flexibility provisions was (as of yet) mostly a competitive policy signaling campaign designed to convey a message about the favorable business climate in the country (Appel and Orenstein, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations: Conceptualizing Disembedded Poli...mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…While domestic business interests did back the government's plans to rewrite labor laws, post-reform developments raise questions about their motives in seeking liberalization reforms. Contrary to expectations, in the first two post-reform years (2018–2019) the proportion of permanent contracts in the Lithuanian labor market continued to grow (albeit with the reduced protections that such contracts now provide), while contract work actually declined and the use of the new flexible forms of employment remained marginal (Juska and Navicke, 2022: 10–11). This suggests that business lobbying for flexibility provisions was (as of yet) mostly a competitive policy signaling campaign designed to convey a message about the favorable business climate in the country (Appel and Orenstein, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerations: Conceptualizing Disembedded Poli...mentioning
confidence: 77%