Labour challenges in Ethiopia’s textile and leather industries: no voice, no loyalty, no exit?

Abstract

A state-led industrialization push inspired by the East Asian ‘developmental state’ model is at the centre of Ethiopia’s recent economic success. This model has historically proved potent for achieving rapid industrialization, but the business-state alliance at the heart of the model generally aimed to curb the power of labour. Focusing on textile and leather manufacturing in Ethiopia, this article addresses two questions: are workers capable of extracting gains from the process of industrialization, and have the actions of workers affected global value chain integration in the two industries? Our data show that opportunities for collective voice among workers are limited. However, workers have expressed their discontent by leaving employers when working conditions fail to meet their expectations. The resulting turnover has generated significant obstacles for local and foreign firms attempting to participate in global value chains. In response, the Ethiopian state and employers implemented a number of measures, including restrictions on emigration and more generous non-wage benefits. Recent research on global value chains and labour highlights how workers are able to influence work practices through individual action. The present article builds on these ideas, but shows that firms and governments have the ability to respond and limit this power.

The dynamics of state–business relations between the Ethiopian state and Chinese private firms: A case study of the Eastern Industry Park

“…In other words, the EIP could not insulate itself from the complicated dynamics of centreperiphery tensions in Ethiopia's political structure, which were exacerbated by the protests that began in 2016 (Clapham 2018;Hardy and Hauge 2019). 33 After the investigation, the EIC started coordinating with the EIP and local authorities over these issues.…”

China as Exemplar: Justin Lin, New Structural Economics, and the Unorthodox Orthodoxy of the China Model

“…Even how China and the Chinese themselves are perceived by Africans reveals a mix of popular ambivalence on one end of the spectrum, and a view of the Chinese as little different than the Western corporations on the other end (see Hanusch 2012; Harneit‐Sievers, Marks, and Naidu 2010). As Lee's (2009) field work in Tanzania and Zambia demonstrates, Chinese corporations are in Africa in search of profit just like anyone else and, much like the exploitative Western states they dismiss, this profit is sought in the low wages and flexible labor practices they can use in Africa (Hardy and Hauge 2019; Mitta 2019). And while local sociopolitical conditions explain the uneven benefits (and costs) of Chinese investments for both African labor and businesses, the day‐to‐day language of many Chinese in Africa recalls the racist caricatures of the (white) colonial past too (Lee 2009).…”

Rethinking the governance of labour standards in South–South regional value chains

“…For instance, based on evidence from the Tippur garment cluster in India, Carswell and De Neve (2013) argue against an analysis of labour solely in terms of 'organised resistance', warranting the importance of 'individual acts and informal practices through which labourers construct their working lives'. Similarly, in a context characterized by fragmented trade unions, Ethiopian apparel workers have resorted to agency-driven practices leveraging labour turnover and informal networks to negotiate better contracts while limiting the ability of firms to participate in GVCs (Hardy and Hauge 2019).…”