Labors of Love: On the Political Economies and Ethics of Bovine Politics in Himalayan India

Abstract

This essay asks how conceptualizing love as work might provide a fresh perspective on love’s politics. In offering an ethnographic account of how love for Gau-Mata, the Cow-Mother of the idealized Hindu nation, fuels a right-wing Hindu nationalist politics of cow-protection in India’s central Himalayan state of Uttarakhand, I suggest that the specific arrangements of labor through which affective attachments are organized critically shape the ethics and politics of love. More specifically, I depict how different kinds of situated labor produced varied kinds of love in the conjoined social worlds of right-wing gau-rakshaks (cow-protectionists) and rural women dairy farmers in Uttarakhand. For these social actors, genuine love for the cow manifested in a willingness to labor for her. Yet their understandings of what this loving labor entailed differed starkly. This article examines three distinct kinds of work—protection, service, and care-labor—that these actors variously undertook out of love for the cow. It traces how these different labors produced a varied set of relationships, affiliations, and obligations that crucially shaped the ethics and politics of love. Ultimately, I show, attending to the varied labors of love in situated social worlds reveals how love can condition a variety of often conflicting political and ethical possibilities, working simultaneously as a force of transcendence, fascist violence, and repair.

BODIES AGAINST MODERNITY: Politics of Slum Rehabilitations in India

“…India's colonial past has made the liberal body politic part of its history and politics. While the liberal body politic was substantially debated by intellectuals during India's independence struggles (Bayly, 2012; Chakrabarty, 2016), India's present‐day majoritarian nationalist politics has produced an ‘ideology of injury and violation … that arouses and electrifies the sentiments of the body politic’ (Govindrajan et al ., 2021: n.p.). These sentiments of the body politic (i.e.…”

Milking Welfare: Bovis Sacer and the Inclusive Thanatopolitics of the Dairy Farm

“…Cows can be understood as biological subjects, structured by their corporal functionality and sensory faculties, and as political subjects (Driessen 2014; Govindrajan 2021; Hobson 2007), through their enjoyment of rights and obligation to perform duties. While cows’ rights are not enshrined in formal policy in the United States, cows are entitled to treatment standards through certification and labelling schemes.…”

More‐than‐human supremacy: Himalayan lessons on cosmopolitics

“…A national ban, organizers argued, was urgently needed to replace existing piecemeal legislation that regulated cow slaughter only in certain Indian states. They also made two further demands: first, the imposition of the death penalty for anyone involved in cattle smuggling or slaughter, and second, the recognition of the cow as rashtra-mata, or mother of the Indian nation (Govindrajan, 2018(Govindrajan, , 2021). GSM's commitment to protecting cows from slaughter was rooted in its conviction that the primordial foundations of Hindu dharma (religion) lay in a presently wounded culture of Gau-Ganga (cow and Ganga) that desperately needed "natural healing."…”

“…24 https://prernamurti.wordpress.com/2015/06/01/gavo-vishwasya-mataraha-prernamurti-bharti-shriji/ "It is from cows that the means for sustaining the worlds has (sic) established." 25 On the virtual life and reach of cow protection, see Govindrajan (2021). 26 In 2023, local members of the BJP justified the expulsion of Muslims from the state on the grounds that they would slaughter the "cow-mother," which, in turn, would lead to all kinds of "natural disasters."…”