2019
DOI: 10.1101/gr.238170.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid

Abstract: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for pan-pathogen detection has been successfully tested in proof-of-concept case studies in patients with acute illness of unknown etiology but to date has been largely confined to research settings. Here, we developed and validated a clinical mNGS assay for diagnosis of infectious causes of meningitis and encephalitis from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a licensed microbiology laboratory. A customized bioinformatics pipeline, SURPI+, was developed to rapidly analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
235
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(48 reference statements)
12
235
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our test set, 8% of samples showed insufficient sensitivity for Hazara virus; however, half of these contained a high titer of influenza virus, so only 4% were true sensitivity failures. This figure is in line with the reported 6% failure rate due to high background for RNA virus detection from a clinically validated metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid (50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our test set, 8% of samples showed insufficient sensitivity for Hazara virus; however, half of these contained a high titer of influenza virus, so only 4% were true sensitivity failures. This figure is in line with the reported 6% failure rate due to high background for RNA virus detection from a clinically validated metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid (50).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further work is needed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of our protocol for a wider array of respiratory sample types (also including bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, sputum, and saliva), which may contain different degrees of contaminating bacterial and/or human reads. Loss of assay sensitivity due to the presence of high-level background DNA from either the host or bacterial origin is a fundamental issue for metagenomic approaches, even in cell-free sample types such as cerebrospinal fluid (50). This challenge is exacerbated in throat swabs, as seen in our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Blood and CSF bacterial cultures, as well as Rickettsia serology, returned negative. Metagenomic next‐generation sequencing testing of CSF (performed subsequently as a research test) using a clinically validated assay did not detect any viruses (RNA and DNA), bacteria, fungi, or parasites above preestablished reporting thresholds . His acute kidney injury improved rapidly with fluid administration.…”
Section: Patient Storymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The barcoded library then directly proceeds into a library recovery step. 5uL of the library is added to an amplification reaction mix (10uL Phusion 5X Buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), 2.5uL of 10uM forward and reverse general primers, 1uL of 12.5mM dNTPs, 0.5uL Phusion enzyme (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA), 31uL nuclease-free water) for 14 cycles, with cycling parameters as previously described (22). The amplicons were again purified using 0.9X volume of AMPure XP beads.…”
Section: Whole Genome Sequencing Of Sars-cov2mentioning
confidence: 99%