2007
DOI: 10.1002/clen.200600019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Testing of Sulfamethoxazole and its Metabolite Acetyl‐Sulfamethoxazole in Soil

Abstract: The fate of 14 C-labeled sulfamethoxazole and acetyl-sulfamethoxazole in soil has been investigated with special respect to possible entry routes of human and veterinary pharmaceuticals into soil environments. Therefore, the stability of the test substances was monitored first in sewage sludge and bovine manure. Within the incubation period of 72 d, 1% at maximum of the initially applied radiotracers was released as 14 C-carbon dioxide while F75% was transferred to non-extractable residues that were operationa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental design was described by Kreuzig et al [13] and Höltge and Kreuzig [15]. The model substances selected were ibuprofen (2-(4-isobutylphenyl)-propionic acid) and diazepam (7-chloro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodiazepine-2-one).…”
Section: Test Substances and Soils Under Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental design was described by Kreuzig et al [13] and Höltge and Kreuzig [15]. The model substances selected were ibuprofen (2-(4-isobutylphenyl)-propionic acid) and diazepam (7-chloro-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodiazepine-2-one).…”
Section: Test Substances and Soils Under Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microbial activity was determined by substrate induced respiration (SIR) measurements [22]. Therefore, the oxygen demands were 0.9 and 0.4 mg O2 100 g -1 dry soil h -1 , respectively, revealing microbially active soil samples [15].…”
Section: Test Substances and Soils Under Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference standards were prepared by dissolving each test substance in an appropriate solvent. The analytical procedures were described in detail by Höltge and Kreuzig [12], Kreuzig and Höltge [14] and Kreuzig et al [23]. The transformation tests in reference manures were conducted in a laboratory batch system traced back to the OECD Guideline 304 A [39] and described in detail by Kreuzig et al [40].…”
Section: Test Substances and Laboratory Batch Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to substantially different conditions of digestion towers and manure tanks, i.e., mode of operation, dwell periods, temperatures, sources of materials, microbial communities etc., information about the fate of biocides in digested sludges can be hardly transferred to liquid manures. This was clearly shown by transformation tests of different 14 Clabeled test substances, e.g., sulfamethoxazole and acetyl-sulfamethoxazole [12]. Several fate monitoring studies applying liquid tank manures have been already conducted [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Then, the flasks were incubated at 20 € 18C in the dark in intervals up to 102 days. Details of the analytical processing were described by Kreuzig and Höltge [1] and Höltge and Kreuzig [28]. For quality assurance, mass balances were set up and selected batches were conducted in duplicate.…”
Section: Degradation Tests In Pig Manurementioning
confidence: 99%