1999
DOI: 10.1177/026765919901400510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory testing of femoral venous cannulae: effect of size, position and negative pressure on flow

Abstract: Femoral venous cannulae (17-28 French) were tested to compare flows obtained by their placement in a simulated inferior vena cava (IVC) or right atrium (RA) and by varying drainage pressures using gravity siphon drainage or a centrifugal pump in the venous line. The circuit consisted of conventional tubing and equipment including a segment of thin-walled latex tubing to simulate the IVC connected to a flexible reservoir to simulate the RA. The test fluid was a 40% glycerin solution. Flow was measured at height… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 As a consequence of the small vascular structures, an optimal venous return is mandatory for a bloodless surgical field. In general, the resistance of cannulae is low in babies because of the relatively large cannula/vein ratio compared to adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3 As a consequence of the small vascular structures, an optimal venous return is mandatory for a bloodless surgical field. In general, the resistance of cannulae is low in babies because of the relatively large cannula/vein ratio compared to adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our pressure ± flow results support previous findings showing no correlation between filling pressure and maximum flow when the cannula is placed in an open reservoir. 3 However, with the cannula placed in the model, filling pressure and cannula size do influence flow rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations