Laboratory Staff Turnover: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 23 Clinical Laboratories

Abstract

Context.— Knowledge of laboratory staff turnover rates are important to laboratory medical directors and hospital administrators who are responsible for ensuring adequate staffing of their clinical laboratories. The current turnover rates for laboratory employees are unknown. Objective.— To determine the 3-year average employee turnover rates for clinical laboratory staff and to survey the types of institutional human resource practices that may be associated with lower turnover rates. Design.— We collected data from participating laboratories spanning a 3-year period of 2015–2017, which included the number of full-time equivalent (FTE) staff members that their laboratories employed in several personnel and departmental categories, and the number of laboratory staff FTEs who vacated each of those categories that institutions intended to refill. We calculated the 3-year average turnover rates for all laboratory employees, for several personnel categories, and for major laboratory departmental categories, and assessed the potential associations between 3-year average all laboratory staff turnover rates with institutional human resource practices. Results.— A total of 23 (20 US and 3 international) participating institutions were included in the analysis. Among the 21 participants providing adequate turnover data, the median of the 3-year average turnover rate for all laboratory staff was 16.2%. Among personnel categories, ancillary staff had the lowest median (11.1% among 21 institutions) and phlebotomist staff had the highest median (24.9% among 20 institutions) of the 3-year average turnover rates. Among laboratory departments, microbiology had the lowest median (7.8% among 18 institutions) and anatomic pathology had the highest median (14.3% among 14 institutions) of the 3-year average turnover rates. Laboratories that developed and communicated clear career paths to their employees and that funded external laboratory continuing education activities had significantly lower 3-year average turnover rates than laboratories that did not implement these strategies. Conclusions.— Laboratory staff turnover rates among institutions varied widely. Two human resource practices were associated with lower laboratory staff turnover rates.

Blood product and laboratory resource wastage in non‐severe allergic transfusion reactions: an opportunity for improvement

“…A 2014 review estimated that 53% of transfusion service/blood bank labs reported being understaffed (Chaffe et al ., ). High turnover of lab technical staff and lack of specialty‐trained/‐qualified technicians are becoming increasingly identified as major challenges to maintaining laboratory quality and minimising lab testing errors (Bolton‐Maggs et al ., ; Novis et al ., ). As fewer technical staff are being expected to perform increasing volumes of testing, any and all efforts to reduce unnecessary testing volume can be expected to have a positive impact on lab quality, as well as workplace/job satisfaction among technical staff.…”

Pathologist workload, work distribution and significant absences or departures at a regional hospital laboratory

“…Novis et al . [ 19 ] studied staff turnover (departures per staff and per time) using a survey and found the median 3 year turnover was 14% in 14 US institutions. The 90 th percentile three-year turnover rate was 28%.…”

Exploring staff turnover, burnout, and resilience in cytology reference laboratories: A workforce qualitative study

“…According to data obtained from one of these laboratory's Security and Exchange Commission's annual 10‐K filing, in 2018 it employed over 61000 employees and processed over 130 million patient‐specimens per year with its presence over 100 countries globally 5 . More importantly, according to a most recent pathology survey, Anatomic Pathology has the highest median 3‐year turnover rate out of the disciplines surveyed 6 . Therefore, understanding potential stressors that exist in large commercial cytology laboratories, and finding out the reasons why some cytotechnologists stay longer at a workplace than others, will be helpful for laboratories in understanding how they can address these issues to enhance work cultures, employee satisfaction, and laboratory quality.…”

“…According to the model's framework, stress and coping effort influence behaviour and outcomes 6 . When individuals are faced with a chronic stressor at work, they will first assess the situation to determine whether it is a negative or positive event (primary appraisal) and also what their options are, given the resources that are at their disposal.…”

“…5 More importantly, according to a most recent pathology survey, Anatomic Pathology has the highest median 3-year turnover rate out of the disciplines surveyed. 6 Therefore, understanding potential stressors that exist in large commercial cytology laboratories, and finding out the reasons why some cytotechnologists stay longer at a workplace than others, will be helpful for laboratories in understanding how they can address these issues to enhance work cultures, employee satisfaction, and laboratory quality. Resilience is the positive adaptation in the face of adversity and is characterised by higher performance and positive mindsets in the face of calamity.…”