2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2016.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory simulation and modeling of size, shape distributed interstellar graphite dust analogues: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancies in computational model in some of the cases are due to the restricted modeling of the particle shapes (using very few shapes) as acquired from the visible evidence (SEM micrographs), and lacks the efficiency of realistic modeling with a large number of irregular shapes. In our previous studies we have successfully reproduced the experimentally acquired light scattering patterns of highly irregular graphite and fayalite microparticles (dispersed in a wide size distribution range) [45,46], with a higher degree of accuracy by realistically modeling the particle shapes based on the characterized samples.…”
Section: Comparisonal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancies in computational model in some of the cases are due to the restricted modeling of the particle shapes (using very few shapes) as acquired from the visible evidence (SEM micrographs), and lacks the efficiency of realistic modeling with a large number of irregular shapes. In our previous studies we have successfully reproduced the experimentally acquired light scattering patterns of highly irregular graphite and fayalite microparticles (dispersed in a wide size distribution range) [45,46], with a higher degree of accuracy by realistically modeling the particle shapes based on the characterized samples.…”
Section: Comparisonal Analysesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The particle surfaces are slightly deformed by displacing the volumetric meshes (provided in the software), to simulate the particle surface roughness and irregularities. The target generation processes are described in detail in our previous publications [45,46]. These representative models of the realistic particle samples are then converted to arrays of dipoles using another software package, DDSCAT Convert©, using 2 × 10 5 dipoles for each of the modeled geometries.…”
Section: • Comparison Of the Theoretical Values Of Computed Scat-mentioning
confidence: 99%