2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchas.2012.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Safety in Academia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because lab safety culture can sometimes be a reflection of department or institution safety culture, ,, respondents were asked questions about safety initiatives at the department or university level. For example, a formal system to report and document near-misses is important to catch early signs/warnings or gauge the effectiveness of the safety program in place and continue to drive a strong safety culture. , About 92% of 26 respondents are familiar with a formal system to report safety incidents including near-misses to the department or university.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because lab safety culture can sometimes be a reflection of department or institution safety culture, ,, respondents were asked questions about safety initiatives at the department or university level. For example, a formal system to report and document near-misses is important to catch early signs/warnings or gauge the effectiveness of the safety program in place and continue to drive a strong safety culture. , About 92% of 26 respondents are familiar with a formal system to report safety incidents including near-misses to the department or university.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have pointed to principal investigators as a major barrier to changing safety practices. Variables such as a lack of knowledge related to safety protocols, lack of funding to investigate safe practices, lack of time to engage in safe practices, and apathy toward changing behavior all contribute to this hurdle. ,,, The perception of PIs as all-knowing further exacerbates the problem, as principal investigators and researchers are assumed to be knowledgeable in all areas of their laboratory, including safety. Even if they sought assistance, where would they turn?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%