2012
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v35i2.76759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory protocols for testing the efficacy of commercial pit latrine additives

Abstract: There is considerable national interest in the use of commercial microbially derived products for controlling the rate of accumulation of the contents of pit latrines. Manufacturers claim that some of these products can reduce accumulation rates, prevent the pit from ever filling up, or even result in decreases in pit contents volume. Prior to this research, there have been no scientific publications that have conclusively supported or refuted these claims. This project undertook to perform reproducible labora… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results support the findings of previous studies (Sugden et al 2006;Foxon et al 2009) that pit latrine additives do not assist in reducing pit filling rates and sludge volumes. However, only two additives were tested, and there may be others which would return a different outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results support the findings of previous studies (Sugden et al 2006;Foxon et al 2009) that pit latrine additives do not assist in reducing pit filling rates and sludge volumes. However, only two additives were tested, and there may be others which would return a different outcome.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In another laboratory study conducted by Sugden (2006) to investigate the efficacy of bio-additives designed to reduce sludge volumes in pit latrines and septic tanks by enhancing the anaerobic digestion process taking place, it was found that though all four stages of anaerobic digestion took place in all of the laboratory test units, there was no evidence to show that any of the bio-additives either enhanced or inhibited the anaerobic digestion process. Foxon et al (2009) also concluded from laboratory experiments that commercial pit latrine additives were unable to accelerate the biodegradation rate and mass loss from samples of pit latrine sludge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a limited number of studies that have reported on decomposition within pit latrines, and only anecdotal evidence into factors that can slow down or speed up decomposition (Couderc et al ., ; Nwaneri et al ., ). Commercial (bio)additives, often based on nutrients, enzymes or bacteria, claim increased decomposition rates, reduced odour and longer pit life spans (Foxon et al ., ), though there is no scientific evidence that these products work, as was shown by a study conducted in South Africa (Buckley et al ., ). Regardless, microbial communities will play an important role in organic matter degradation within pit latrines, though little is known about the microbial communities present in pit latrines and their association with faecal decomposition within the pit environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was mass loss in both trials due to treatment with commercial additives, the reduction was concluded to be statistically insignificant. In another study (Foxon et al, 2009), two laboratory trials were carried out to test the efficacy of commercial pit latrine additive in reducing sludge content in pit latrines. In trial 1, the effect of aerobic and anaerobic conditions was tested.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%