2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory protocols for testing of Improved Cooking Stoves (ICSs): A review of state-of-the-art and further developments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in both types of chulha, there is an increasing trend of higher thermal efficiency and lower consumption of wood during the three phases of WTB (cold < hot < simmering). The specific fuelwood consumption is a preferable parameter to evaluate simmering performance (Lombardi et al 2017). Five trails of WBT were carried out in the present investigation for both IMC and TMC and showed that the thermal performance of IMC was recorded higher than TMC.…”
Section: Thermal Efficiency Using Water Boiling Test (Wbt)mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in both types of chulha, there is an increasing trend of higher thermal efficiency and lower consumption of wood during the three phases of WTB (cold < hot < simmering). The specific fuelwood consumption is a preferable parameter to evaluate simmering performance (Lombardi et al 2017). Five trails of WBT were carried out in the present investigation for both IMC and TMC and showed that the thermal performance of IMC was recorded higher than TMC.…”
Section: Thermal Efficiency Using Water Boiling Test (Wbt)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The thermal efficiency of IMC over TMC was evaluated by following the well-defined water boiling test protocol (WBT protocol version 4.1.2) (Lombardi et al 2017). While there are many other methods for testing cooking stoves used by governments and organizations around the world, the water boiling test was chosen because it has been written and continually revised by the cooperation of international experts in the field.…”
Section: Thermal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, cleaner cookstoves are intended to reduce the amount of fuel used, requiring both baseline and post-intervention usage data. As previously stated, metrics obtained from lab testing on cleaner cookstoves historically vary significantly from actual field performance (Lombardi 2017). As such, obtaining accurate field data is important to validate the assertion that the new stove saves fuel.…”
Section: Choosing Outcomes and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting to underline that both ICS performed in a similar way in the field, even if the commercial model was supposed to be more efficient, based on laboratory tests. This fact gives evidence on the fact that users' behavior and practices influence the real performances of stoves in the field, thus results from laboratory tests should not be used as the only and most important parameter to select the best ICS model (Lombardi et al 2017). …”
Section: Comparison Of Improved Cookstoves (Car)mentioning
confidence: 99%