2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0ee02967j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory protocols for measuring and reporting the performance of luminescent solar concentrators

Abstract: Recommendation of standardised experiments for adoption by all researchers on luminescent solar concentrators to unify reporting and legitimise the field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
109
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained optical efficiencies are very promising considering that the devices preserve transparencies of 69% and 74% in the visible range of the solar spectrum (400–700 nm) and that the optical properties of the QDs are not yet optimized (PL QY = 70%). These results are in line with the performance of other devices [ 11,12,16,17,21 ] of comparable dimensions, [ 16,21,30,31,32,29 ] and with a similar degree of transparency (an overview of some of these devices is shown in Table S5, Supporting Information). As shown in Table 1, the LSC prepared with GSH based AIS/ZnS QDs performs slightly better than the LSC derived from initially MPA‐capped AIS/ZnS QDs despite the red shifted emission band of the MPA‐based QDs (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The obtained optical efficiencies are very promising considering that the devices preserve transparencies of 69% and 74% in the visible range of the solar spectrum (400–700 nm) and that the optical properties of the QDs are not yet optimized (PL QY = 70%). These results are in line with the performance of other devices [ 11,12,16,17,21 ] of comparable dimensions, [ 16,21,30,31,32,29 ] and with a similar degree of transparency (an overview of some of these devices is shown in Table S5, Supporting Information). As shown in Table 1, the LSC prepared with GSH based AIS/ZnS QDs performs slightly better than the LSC derived from initially MPA‐capped AIS/ZnS QDs despite the red shifted emission band of the MPA‐based QDs (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We assessed the optical response of PyPBTM/PMMA LSC devices as light harvesting and conversion photonic systems using two key figures of merit: the external photon efficiency η ext , defined as the ratio of the total output photon flux measured at the four edges of the LSC with respect to the incident photon flux, and the internal photon efficiency η int , given by the total output photon flux measured at the four edges of the LSC relative to the absorbed photon flux (definitions and calculations are reported in the Supporting Information). 59 As shown in Fig. 7, η ext increased with PyPBTM concentration, reaching a maximum η ext ≈ 0.50% at 3 wt%.…”
Section: Transparent Colourless Lscsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…η ext and η int were calculated from the experimental data according to Equations (S4) and (S5), Supporting Information. [27] As shown in Figure 5, up to a concentration of 12.5 wt%, a relatively constant η int was observed (≈18%), followed by a slight decrease at the higher luminophore loadings. As concerns η ext , its highest value (≈3.5%) was achieved for PFPBNT loading equal to 12.5 wt%, in agreement with the photophysical response of this system previously discussed.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluation Of Pfpbnt/pmma-based Lsc Performance and Monte Carlo Ray-tracing Modelingmentioning
confidence: 75%