2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.025002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Observations of Electron Heating and Non-Maxwellian Distributions at the Kinetic Scale during Electron-Only Magnetic Reconnection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These processes include the formation of electron current sheets and outflows within an electron dissipation region [12][13][14] , and electron temperature anisotropy excitation of whistler waves 15,16,18 . The magnetic reconnection without coupling to ions is observed in the magnetosheath because of tiny spatial and temporal scales of turbulent plasmas 14 .The basic properties of "electron-only reconnection", which can lead to Sweet-Parker reconnection in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) limit, have been investigated 7,[19][20][21] ; numerical simulations show that the electron-only reconnection starts to transit to ion-coupled (MHD) reconnection at the spatial scale of 10d i , where d i is the ion skin depth 19 . The electron outflows close to the electron Alfvén velocity are observed 7,14,20,21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These processes include the formation of electron current sheets and outflows within an electron dissipation region [12][13][14] , and electron temperature anisotropy excitation of whistler waves 15,16,18 . The magnetic reconnection without coupling to ions is observed in the magnetosheath because of tiny spatial and temporal scales of turbulent plasmas 14 .The basic properties of "electron-only reconnection", which can lead to Sweet-Parker reconnection in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) limit, have been investigated 7,[19][20][21] ; numerical simulations show that the electron-only reconnection starts to transit to ion-coupled (MHD) reconnection at the spatial scale of 10d i , where d i is the ion skin depth 19 . The electron outflows close to the electron Alfvén velocity are observed 7,14,20,21 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic reconnection without coupling to ions is observed in the magnetosheath because of tiny spatial and temporal scales of turbulent plasmas 14 .The basic properties of "electron-only reconnection", which can lead to Sweet-Parker reconnection in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) limit, have been investigated 7,[19][20][21] ; numerical simulations show that the electron-only reconnection starts to transit to ion-coupled (MHD) reconnection at the spatial scale of 10d i , where d i is the ion skin depth 19 . The electron outflows close to the electron Alfvén velocity are observed 7,14,20,21 . These fast magnetic reconnection processes can be expressed as standing whistler waves (or standing kinetic Alfvén waves in the presence of a guide field), as MHD phenomena can be treated as a superposition of Alfvén waves [22][23][24][25] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differs from the standard picture of collisionless reconnection (Ishizawa et al, 2004;Malyshkin, 2008;Yamada, 2011), where the reconnection region consists of an electron-scale layer within a wider ion-scale diffusion region. These electron-only reconnection regions have been observed in the Earth's magnetosheath and shock transition region (Phan et al, 2018;Gingell et al, 2020), foreshock (Wang et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020), magnetotail (S. Lu et al, 2020) and laboratory experiments (Shi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This differs from the standard picture of collisionless reconnection (Ishizawa et al., 2004; Malyshkin, 2008; Yamada, 2011), where the reconnection region consists of an electron‐scale layer within a wider ion‐scale diffusion region. These electron‐only reconnection regions have been observed in the Earth's magnetosheath and shock transition region (Gingell et al., 2019, 2020, 2021; Phan et al., 2018; Stawarz et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2019), foreshock (Liu et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020), magnetotail (S. Lu et al., 2020) and laboratory experiments (Shi et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%