2009
DOI: 10.1309/lm9njgw2ziolphy6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Monitoring of Heparin Therapy: Partial Thromboplastin Time or Anti-Xa Assay?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Options include weight-adjusted administration (as used in LMWH anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism [5]), fixed dose (as used for thromboprophylaxis [5]), and with or without monitoring using the anti-Xa activity assay as a surrogate of anticoagulation. Monitoring is used in some clinical settings, but has not become routine as its applicability at predicting clinical outcomes remains uncertain [6]. Much of the published data on LMWH (and UFH) has used clinical measures of coagulation or bleeding to assess efficacy and safety, or a single-point anti-Xa measurement to make the case for wider safe usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Options include weight-adjusted administration (as used in LMWH anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism [5]), fixed dose (as used for thromboprophylaxis [5]), and with or without monitoring using the anti-Xa activity assay as a surrogate of anticoagulation. Monitoring is used in some clinical settings, but has not become routine as its applicability at predicting clinical outcomes remains uncertain [6]. Much of the published data on LMWH (and UFH) has used clinical measures of coagulation or bleeding to assess efficacy and safety, or a single-point anti-Xa measurement to make the case for wider safe usage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heparin levels were measured on the CA1500 using a chromogenic anti-Xa assay 12 . The anti-Xa assay is considered a more reliable measure of heparin activity than aPTT, especially at low heparin levels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xa levels of 0.3-0.8 IU/mL normally correlate with an aPTT of 90-110 seconds [147]. Because the aPTT is dependent upon the reagents used, individual ranges must be established at each institution in accordance with the College of American Pathologists' recommendations [148]. Even within the same institution, individual patients on ECMO may have variations in their underlying coagulation system or treatment that impacts the correlations between heparin levels and their coagulation tests [126].…”
Section: Anti-xa Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%