2001
DOI: 10.1385/criai:21:2-3:111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Methods for Allergen Extract Analysis and Quality Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard methods for allergen quantification are immunoassays (7,41,42). A range of assays to detect environmental and occupational allergens have been described and applied, but only few of them are commercially available ( Table 5).…”
Section: Allergen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standard methods for allergen quantification are immunoassays (7,41,42). A range of assays to detect environmental and occupational allergens have been described and applied, but only few of them are commercially available ( Table 5).…”
Section: Allergen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring airborne allergens, with levels in the pg to ng/m 3 range, requires high sensitivity, and therefore usually a two-sited sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with capture antibodies and labeled detection antibodies are used. Such assays can be 10-to 1000-fold more sensitive than an inhibition assay using the same antibodies (41,42). Assay sensitivity can be further enhanced by signal amplification kits that utilize enzyme cascade or cycle systems, or conjugates with multiple enzymes (43,45).…”
Section: Allergen Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IgE-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) inhibition has proven to be an ideal platform for evaluating allergen preparations [2,18,19]. It requires a well-characterized allergosorbent (solid-phase), a reference serum pool obtained from allergic donors, and a reference allergen preparation.…”
Section: In Vitro Potency Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often difficult to assess how these variables account for the observed differences in assay results using the same materials, format, or reagents [2,19]. These differences may have several explanations, including the interaction of the allergen with the solid phase, differences in the structural requirements for antigen-antibody binding in the solid and fluid phases, or differences in determinant valency of the target allergens.…”
Section: In Vitro Potency Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation