2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceano.2017.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory measurements of remote sensing reflectance of selected phytoplankton species from the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenge with this reductionist approach is that the optical calculations require the concentration‐specific optical properties of each of the variables it represents. This type of data is common and available for benthic substrates (Roelfsema & Phinn, ) and the pigments contained within phytoplankton species (Soja‐Woźniak et al, ) but is much rarer for single mineral suspensions (exception is Stramski et al, ). Further complicating the optical properties of mineral grain mixtures is that both the mineralogy (carbonate, quartz, and illite) and the PSD are likely to vary between different natural environments, and during time at individual locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The challenge with this reductionist approach is that the optical calculations require the concentration‐specific optical properties of each of the variables it represents. This type of data is common and available for benthic substrates (Roelfsema & Phinn, ) and the pigments contained within phytoplankton species (Soja‐Woźniak et al, ) but is much rarer for single mineral suspensions (exception is Stramski et al, ). Further complicating the optical properties of mineral grain mixtures is that both the mineralogy (carbonate, quartz, and illite) and the PSD are likely to vary between different natural environments, and during time at individual locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherent optical properties, and the concentration of optically significant constituents, can be derived from remote-sensing reflectance; however, in optically complex waters global empirical and globally parameterized semianalytical remotely sensed algorithms tend to fail (Darecki & Stramski, 2004;Kratzer et al, 2008;Woźniak et al, 2014;Qin et al, 2007). A better understanding of coastal bio-optical properties is crucial to the accurate estimation of the seawater components from optical remote sensing (Aurin & Dierssen, 2012;Babin et al, 2003;Miller et al, 2005;Odermatt et al, 2012;Reynolds et al, 2001;Sathyendranath et al, 1989Sathyendranath et al, , 2016Soja-Woźniak et al, 2017) and for parameterizing biogeochemical models (Baird, Adams, et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xi et al 2017) as well as direct measurements (e.g. Soja-Wozniak et al 2018) made on the main phytoplankton groups (Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, Haptophyta, Dinophyta, Cryptophyta and Heterkontophyta) suggest that absorption by these phytoplankton groups is strongest between ~520 and 650 nm. Gut phytoplankton may therefore contribute to part of the absorption feature we measured between 460 and 590 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we took a step forward from modeling to in situ experiment in a unique attempt to measure the R rs of dispersed oil pollution in open sea conditions. We applied the idea of a comparative study between natural seawater and seawater polluted by oil droplets, as commonly practiced in ocean optics, e.g., on phytoplankton species [67] or other aquatic vegetation [68].…”
Section: Measurements Of the Remote Sensing Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%