2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2008)134:3(302)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Investigation on Reactivated Residual Strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When landslides reach the dormant state, the shear strength could be recovered (Gibo et al, 2002;Nakamura, 2002;Carrubba & Del Fabbro, 2008), and it is expected that the recovered shear strength is time dependent. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Recovery Of Shear Strength With Consolidation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When landslides reach the dormant state, the shear strength could be recovered (Gibo et al, 2002;Nakamura, 2002;Carrubba & Del Fabbro, 2008), and it is expected that the recovered shear strength is time dependent. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Recovery Of Shear Strength With Consolidation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case if we presume that the initial decrease in friction of 1) an aged, normally consolidated soil is comparable to the decrease in friction of 2) an overconsolidated clay that has a) been sheared to a residual friction and b) been allowed to regain some strength under fixed displacement. While the strength gain is time dependent, for experiments on 2) with healing times of 100–200 days the drop in friction coefficient with slip is low ( f p − f r ≈ 0.05), but occurs over smaller displacements, with initial slip‐weakening rates in the range w = 0.3–0.8/cm [ Stark et al , 2005; Carrubba and Del Fabbro , 2008; Stark and Hussain , 2010]. A freshly sedimented seafloor, like that presented in section 2 with accumulation rates of the order of 1 mm/yr, would represent a potentially well aged, normally consolidated slope.…”
Section: Rupture Nucleation By Local Increases In Pore Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while marine sediments are ideally considered as normally consolidated, given typical sedimentation rates on these slopes (∼mm/yr or less) strength may develop due to the long lifetime of interparticle contacts. Such behavior is indicated by increased sample stiffness following long periods of fixed loads in consolidation tests [e.g., Karig and Ask , 2003]; by the development of increasingly peaked stress‐strain profiles under triaxial loading conditions for normally consolidated samples previously held under loads for increasingly long times [e.g., Bjerrum and Lo , 1963]; as well as evidence of strength regain in ring‐shear tests after a period of fixed displacement [e.g., Stark et al , 2005; Carrubba and Del Fabbro , 2008; Stark and Hussain , 2010]. Such strength would be lost upon sufficient disruption of contacts (i.e., the sediments are considered sensitive), and if weakening is sufficiently strong, localized deformation may be expected as for overconsolidated sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stark et al (2005) observed that the magnitude of recovered shear strength increases with increasing soil plasticity, but the recovered strength was lost with small shear displacement. Carrubba and Del Fabbro (2008) conducted Bromhead (1979) ring shear tests, similar to those performed by Stark et al (2005), for aging times of up to 30 days and found more strength gain in Montona flysch than in Rosazzo flysch. Strength recovery is negligible in clayey soils after a 3 day rest period, but it is lost after a small shear displacement (Bhat et al, 2013b, c, d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%