2018
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.23097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory investigation of oil viscosity effect during carbonated water injection: Comparison of secondary and tertiary recovery

Abstract: Although the effect of viscosity on oil recovery is well established, no systematic investigation has been implemented regarding the effect of oil viscosity changes on performance of carbonated water injection (CWI). In this study, the performance of CWI with different oil viscosities and rock wettability was investigated through two main series of high-pressure core flooding experiments on both clean and aged sand. The results obtained demonstrate that the capability of carbonated water to enhance oil recover… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, in the case of the United States the CO 2 storage capacity for saline aquifers is estimated as 12,000 Gt CO 2 (Celia, ) while the estimation for depleted oil reservoirs is about 20 Gt CO 2 (Godec et al, ). So deep saline aquifers are the primary long‐term options for carbon problem mitigation, while in the near‐term CO 2‐enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is increasingly being recognized as a commercial alternative to storage only operations (Balashov et al, ; Koytsoumpa et al, ; Kolster et al, ; Orr Jr, ; Shokri et al, ; Tapia et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, in the case of the United States the CO 2 storage capacity for saline aquifers is estimated as 12,000 Gt CO 2 (Celia, ) while the estimation for depleted oil reservoirs is about 20 Gt CO 2 (Godec et al, ). So deep saline aquifers are the primary long‐term options for carbon problem mitigation, while in the near‐term CO 2‐enhanced oil recovery (EOR) is increasingly being recognized as a commercial alternative to storage only operations (Balashov et al, ; Koytsoumpa et al, ; Kolster et al, ; Orr Jr, ; Shokri et al, ; Tapia et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our achievements are also confirmed by the photographic images that are shown in Figure , which visualizes the elongation of the oil drop following the pendant drop method with the use of the nanofluids of FAU–0.09CTAB. It is worth mentioning here that the IFT measurements cannot be achieved with values less than 3mN/m due to the limitations associated with the pendant drop method at which the drop shape is no longer Laplacian …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning here that the IFT measurements cannot be achieved with values less than 3mN/m due to the limitations associated with the pendant drop method at which the drop shape is no longer Laplacian. 45 The concentration of surfactant molecules grafted on FAU nanoparticles strongly influences the dynamic IFT reduction performance, as shown in Figure 9. It is expected that grafting greater amounts of CTAB on FAU nanoparticles, as confirmed by the TGA tests, might lead to enhancing the reduction in the IFT.…”
Section: Dynamic Light Scattering (Dls)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with fluid-rock interactions, fluid-fluid interactions have been noticed during carbonated waterflooding in the microfluidic model. Fluid-fluid interactions include: (a) promoting oil swelling, (b) oil viscosity reduction, , (c) lowering oil-brine interfacial tension (IFT), (d) micro dispersion generation, ,, and (e) exsolution of CO 2 . However, compared to intensive investigation of fluid-rock interactions, the contribution of fluid-fluid interactions to multiphase flow has not been adequately addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%