2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory investigation of nonlinear flow characteristics in rough fractures during shear process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation trend is similar to that (with = 1.0 or 5.0 MPa) reported in Javadi et al [92]. As an example, when = 1.0 MPa, Re that corresponds to a small in the work of Javadi et al [92] is much smaller than that in the work of Rong et al [104]; however when is relatively large, Re in the work of Javadi et al [92] is approximately 2.0∼2.5 times that in the work of Rong et al [104]. The differences of Re evolution are dependent on fracture's morphology such as mean JRC.…”
Section: Effect Of Shear Displacementsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This variation trend is similar to that (with = 1.0 or 5.0 MPa) reported in Javadi et al [92]. As an example, when = 1.0 MPa, Re that corresponds to a small in the work of Javadi et al [92] is much smaller than that in the work of Rong et al [104]; however when is relatively large, Re in the work of Javadi et al [92] is approximately 2.0∼2.5 times that in the work of Rong et al [104]. The differences of Re evolution are dependent on fracture's morphology such as mean JRC.…”
Section: Effect Of Shear Displacementsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They reported that Re for the samples G1∼G4 and S1∼S2 varies in the ranges 0.075∼ 9.243, 0.120∼4.467, 0.160∼5.108, 0.039∼4.509, 0.191∼4.090, and 0.026∼2.976, respectively. The results of Rong et al [104] as reported in Section 3.1 show that when = 0 mm, Re steadily decreases, presenting the same trend with the sample G1 in Figure 12. However, for samples under shear with > 0 mm, with the increment of confining pressure, Re firstly increases and then decreases as shown in Figure 13, presenting the same trends with most of the samples in Figure 12.…”
Section: Effects Of Normal Stress And/or Confining Pressuresupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In view of the fact that the variations of linear and nonlinear coefficients and against and are very similar, as a function of was analyzed [29], as plotted in Figure 7(e). The experimental data can be fitted very well using the following empirical function: = 7.899 × 10 6 0.766 .…”
Section: Test Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For engineering purposes, a critical value of = 10% has been defined as the critical condition for onset of flow nonlinearity in fracture networks, where the nonlinear effect can be appreciable and cannot be neglected [23,24,29].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation