All Days 2014
DOI: 10.2118/169658-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Investigation of Miscible CO2 WAG Injection Efficiency in Carbonate

Abstract: Remaining oil saturation, trapped gas saturation, three-phase relative permeability and injectivity are among the many parameters that play a major role in miscible CO2 water-alternating-gas (WAG) injection efficiency. In this work, we present a series of coreflood experiments designed to assess these parameters and investigate the microscopic efficiency of CO2 WAG injection on carbonated reservoirs, far above minimum miscibility pressure (MMP). Experiments were carried out on intermediate-wet c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher recovery is obtained if the injected gas achieves miscibility at reservoir condition and the oil left behind, as S orm is very low. There will be trapping of large amount of gas during the 1 st cycle of WAG injection that will be reduced subsequently in later cycles (Duchenne et al, 2014). Figure 9 shows the oil recovery and GOR match of the two experiments performed using Eclipse software.…”
Section: Exp# 2: Coreflood At 4800psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher recovery is obtained if the injected gas achieves miscibility at reservoir condition and the oil left behind, as S orm is very low. There will be trapping of large amount of gas during the 1 st cycle of WAG injection that will be reduced subsequently in later cycles (Duchenne et al, 2014). Figure 9 shows the oil recovery and GOR match of the two experiments performed using Eclipse software.…”
Section: Exp# 2: Coreflood At 4800psimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of gas injected is also a highlight; applications with CO 2 injections have produced better results than hydrocarbons or other gases (Christensen et al 1998). The literature results also showed higher efficiency of CO 2 -WAG injections compared to pure CO 2 injections (Duchenne et al 2014). However, these recovery methods present high operating costs due to the gas, which represents a large fraction of the total cost, besides requiring compression and gas injection equipment, especially for CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kulkarni and Rao (2005) showed that the results with WAG recovery were better than CGI and the miscible condition was more favorable than the immiscible. Duchenne et al (2014) investigated the microscopic efficiency of CO 2 in the WAG injection well above the minimum pressure of miscibility (MMP) in the samples. They found recovery factors of the order of 80%, measured through a precise system of monitoring the saturations of the three phases and by calculating the volume produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late 60s, a number of laboratory and simulation studies has been conducted in detail concerning different issues of WAG process properties and design [18,[48][49][50], enabling us to use it more effectively in different reservoir conditions. Most of the published laboratory WAG process studies are focused on commonly used hydrocarbon and non-hydrocarbon (especially pure CO 2 and N 2 ) [19,51,52] gases. Increased interest in CO 2 EOR is particularly evident in recent years because of its high effectivity as well as environmental and economic implication when combined with CCS [53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%