2017
DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2017-0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Information System – Where are we Today?

Abstract: SummaryWider implementation of laboratory information systems (LIS) in clinical laboratories in Serbia has been initiated ten years ago. The first LIS in the Railway Health Care Institute has been implemented nine years ago. Before the LIS was initiated, manual admission procedures limited daily output of patients. Moreover, manual entering of patients data and ordering tests on analyzers was problematic and time consuming. After completing tests, laboratory personnel had to write results in patient register (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They foster accuracy and accessibility to the flow of samples and data in clinical laboratories. Physicians may easily track each step in the testing process, from the administration of tests to the receipt of test results which supports timely decision-making and diagnosis 44 . It is important to enable bi-directional interfaces between LISs and other information systems such as EHRs to ensure a seamless flow of information ranging from test ordering to results storing for clinical decision support 45 46 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They foster accuracy and accessibility to the flow of samples and data in clinical laboratories. Physicians may easily track each step in the testing process, from the administration of tests to the receipt of test results which supports timely decision-making and diagnosis 44 . It is important to enable bi-directional interfaces between LISs and other information systems such as EHRs to ensure a seamless flow of information ranging from test ordering to results storing for clinical decision support 45 46 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model having an out-reach program for the laboratory services with pre-defined testing menu that was based on the best practices was found to be more efficient and gave better quality and utilization of the services as shown by the improved KPIs result as well as the increased demands over time. Interventions related to closing the communication gap between PHC physicians and the KFMC lab and the introduction of the LIS system made the requesting and result reception a lean process [33]. Communicating the potentials of this piloted model and presenting the KPI results to the PHC directors aided in securing the proper support for going forward with this model, which was reflected in the gradual increase of the samples tested from month to month (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may also decrease specimen rejections due to specimen integrity or deterioration of analytes, this may overcome urgent specimen transportation issues, that we may face in this current model [32]. Moreover, the continuation of establishment of an LIS system across PHCs will help in minimizes labeling errors, unifies test request practices, serves as a communication platform for results and rejection, provides data extraction for quality and performance analysis, and is standardized and protected [24,33,34]. Lastly the, utilization of personnel time is an area to focus on in the future as it may positively impact the cost of services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the rest of these kits require a specific instrument for the detection step. Although the visual detection is simpler and cost-effective requiring less equipment, the reader-based tests have the advantage of getting the results automatically from the analyzer and releasing the results sending messages and posting the results to the patient file by integrating Laboratory Information System (LIS) to their detecting system [ 127 ].…”
Section: Rapid Antigenic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%