2008
DOI: 10.1303/aez.2008.397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory hybridization between the two clades of Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae)

Abstract: We conducted mating experiments between two clades of the pea leafminer, Liriomyza huidobrensis, i.e., California Clade (CC) and South America Clade (SC). Development times from egg to pupa and egg to adult at 25°C of the two clades and the hybrid progeny were compared. In the interclade mating cross, adult hybrid progenies were obtained only from matings between CC females and SC males. The number of hybrid progeny was quite smaller than those from combinations of the same clade. Furthermore, no F2 progeny wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent molecular research ( Scheffer 2000 , Scheffer and Lewis 2001 ) found that the North America populations in California and Hawai’i are distinct from L. huidobrensis in South America, and the former species, Liriomyza langei , was resurrected. Subsequently, Takano et al (2008) detected reproductive isolation between L. huidobrensis and L. langei , providing additional strong evidence for the species rank of L. langei .…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, recent molecular research ( Scheffer 2000 , Scheffer and Lewis 2001 ) found that the North America populations in California and Hawai’i are distinct from L. huidobrensis in South America, and the former species, Liriomyza langei , was resurrected. Subsequently, Takano et al (2008) detected reproductive isolation between L. huidobrensis and L. langei , providing additional strong evidence for the species rank of L. langei .…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In 1973, Spencer then synonymized the two species as they were (and de facto remain) morphologically indistinguishable. Following a study of their mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences (Scheffer, 2000; Scheffer & Lewis, 2001), and supported by later rearing experiments (Takano et al., 2008), the two species were formally separated as two cryptic species (Lonsdale, 2011). The name L .…”
Section: Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…langei has been confirmed only from the USA and it is highly likely that all invasive populations outside the USA are L . huidobrensis as now taxonomically defined (Scheffer & Lewis, 2001; Scheffer et al., 2001; Takano et al., 2008; Lonsdale, 2011). Liriomyza huidobrensis is highly polyphagous and has been recorded from 15 plant families (CABI, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1973, Spencer synonymised the two species as they are morphologically indistinguishable. Following a study of specific sequences in mitochondrial and nuclear genomes (Scheffer, 2000;Scheffer and Lewis, 2001), later supported by rearing experiments (Takano et al, 2008), the two species were recognised as two cryptic species. The name L. langei Frick was resurrected and applied to the species in California, and the name L. huidobrensis (Blanchard) was applied to the species from Central and South America.…”
Section: Liriomyza Huidobrensismentioning
confidence: 99%