2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory evaluation of the effect of compaction method and compaction work on the performance of SMA-13 mixture

Abstract: The influence of compaction methods such as the Marshall compaction method (MCM), vibration compaction method (VCM) and gyration compaction method (GCM), on the performance of stone mastic asphalt (SMA-13) mixture has yet to be explored. Therefore, to compare the influences of compaction methods and work on the physical and mechanical properties of SMA-13 mixture, the volume parameters, mechanical properties, and gradation changes of SMA-13 mixture specimens prepared under different vibration compaction times,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…erefore, the compaction method plays a key role in the internal aggregate positioning and arrangement of SMA-13 mixture and the VTM is more conducive to the rearrangement of internal aggregates and the formation of stable structure than SGC and MCM [32].…”
Section: Splitting Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…erefore, the compaction method plays a key role in the internal aggregate positioning and arrangement of SMA-13 mixture and the VTM is more conducive to the rearrangement of internal aggregates and the formation of stable structure than SGC and MCM [32].…”
Section: Splitting Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e microdamage gradually accumulates and expands under the action of repeated stress, resulting in the structural damage of mixture. Compared with the SMA-13 mixture compacted by the Marshall and SGC methods, the air voids of the SMA-13 mixture compacted by the VTM method was reduced by approximately 30%, which can decrease the local heterogeneity of the material microstructure and is conducive to improving the fatigue was reduced by 20% under the same repeated stress, and the fatigue resistance of the mixture was significantly improved [32].…”
Section: Influence Of the Compaction Methods On Fatigue Performance O...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For 4 cm SMA pavements on bridge decks, vibratory compaction tends to crush the aggregate, destroy the integrity of the surface coarse aggregate, result in a loose mixture and reduced compaction, and increase the vertical vibration of the bridge deck and the longitudinal pushing of the pavement, resulting in bond failure at the paving layer interface and damaging the levelness [3]. For the bridge itself, it can increase the vertical vibration of the deck, which can seriously cause internal damage to the bridge structure and reduce bridge safety [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%