1985
DOI: 10.13031/2013.32252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Evaluation of Potassium Permanganate for Ethylene Removal from CA Apple Storages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports have shown the positive effects of either one these treatments on quality maintenance and shelf life extension of apple fruits (Lidster et al . ; Tatsuki et al . ; Jeziorek et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports have shown the positive effects of either one these treatments on quality maintenance and shelf life extension of apple fruits (Lidster et al . ; Tatsuki et al . ; Jeziorek et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published studies using a laboratory prepared or a commercial potassium permanganate product have evaluated the effect of single weight of product on a single produce with most papers not reporting the concentration of potassium permanganate in the product used and often not determining the effect on ethylene concentration. The most comprehensive studies on potassium permanganate were fi rstly by Lidster et al (1985) who found that alumina pellets retained a much greater amount of potassium permanganate than expanded glass beads, the effi ciency of each product to reduce ethylene increased with temperature but contrasting effects were obtained with increasing relative humidity (RH). Secondly, Kavanagh and Wade (1987) studied 21 carrier materials and found large variation among carriers with those of lower bulk density and a higher capacity to absorb potassium permanganate being more effi cient in reducing ethylene levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potassium permanganate (KMnO 4 ) is the most widely used ethylene scavenger; however, it is not suitable for food applications due to its high toxicity. KMnO 4 decomposes ethylene via the following reaction: Ozone, as a strong oxidant, is another candidate for ethylene scavenging; , however, it is difficult to handle because it easily decomposes into oxygen, and it is toxic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%