2017
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1333634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory evaluation of an optimised internet-based speech-in-noise test for occupational high-frequency hearing loss screening: Occupational Earcheck

Abstract: Objective: The ''Occupational Earcheck'' (OEC) is a Dutch online self-screening speech-in-noise test developed for the detection of occupational high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL). This study evaluates an optimised version of the test and determines the most appropriate masking noise. Design: The original OEC was improved by homogenisation of the speech material, and shortening the test. A laboratory-based cross-sectional study was performed in which the optimised OEC in five alternative masking noise conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chief patient complaint is usually difficulty understanding during conversations rather than hearing impairment itself and leads to low discrimination scores in the speech-in-noise test. When it progresses to 2-4 kHz, it affects speech understanding in most situations [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chief patient complaint is usually difficulty understanding during conversations rather than hearing impairment itself and leads to low discrimination scores in the speech-in-noise test. When it progresses to 2-4 kHz, it affects speech understanding in most situations [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, within LMICs, individuals may be required to travel substantial distances for hearing screening as health care providers are severely limited and unequally distributed (Mulwafu et al, 2017). The high costs involved and limited access to population-based hearing screening has led to various initiatives to use telephone-and Internet-based speech-innoise (SIN) screening tests (Folmer et al, 2017;Jansen, Luts, Wagener, Frachet, & Wouters, 2010;Paglialonga, Tognola, & Grandori, 2014;Sheikh Rashid, Leensen, de Laat, & Dreschler, 2017;Smits, Kapteyn, & Houtgast, 2004;Vlaming, MacKinnon, Jansen, & Moore, 2014;Watson, Kidd, Miller, Smits, & Humes, 2012). Although all these tests measure speech recognition in noise, they vary in terms of speech stimuli, type of background noise, and test procedure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subject would get a poor (i.e., positive) result for OEC if the test result of at least one ear was ≥ − 14.9 dB SNR. More details on the development of OEC are described elsewhere by Sheikh Rashid et al ( 2017a , b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rescreening was conditional: a retest was only provided for the ear(s) with a positive test result, or with an intra-individual SD of > 3 dB. Based on previous research, test results with an intra-individual SD of > 3 dB were considered unreliable (Sheikh Rashid et al 2017a ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation