Coastal Engineering 2004 2005
DOI: 10.1142/9789812701916_0359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Effects and Further Uncertainties Associated With Wave Overtopping Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that there was good agreement for waves of the same incident crest height, though the data were scattered due to interference by preceding waves and some difficulties in measuring individual overtopped volumes. Pearson et al (2002) and Kortenhaus et al (2004) used weighing cells to determine individual overtopping volumes. The latter found this technique to be more accurate than using either a wave gauge in an overtopping tank or a pair of pressure transducers at the floor of the tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that there was good agreement for waves of the same incident crest height, though the data were scattered due to interference by preceding waves and some difficulties in measuring individual overtopped volumes. Pearson et al (2002) and Kortenhaus et al (2004) used weighing cells to determine individual overtopping volumes. The latter found this technique to be more accurate than using either a wave gauge in an overtopping tank or a pair of pressure transducers at the floor of the tank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RS Instruments load cell was employed for the measurement of wave overtopping quantities following the findings of Kortenhaus et al 8 regarding the accuracy of different methods of measuring wave overtopping discharges. A rectangular container in which overtopping water was to be collected was suspended from the load cell mounted on a rigid beam placed across the concrete walls of the wave flume.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from field measurements or from large-scale laboratory tests are rather rare. Studies have been performed only recently under the CLASH project Geeraerts & Boone, 2004;Geeraerts & Willems, 2004;Hordijk, 2004;Kortenhaus et al, 2004a;Pullen & Allsop, 2004a in order to fill this gap and allow investigation of both the model and scale effects [Kortenhaus et al, 2004bde Rouck et al, 2005]. One of the conclusions arising from the investigations identifies the number of incident random waves during physical model tests as a key model effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If extreme statistics are required from the tests, such as the maximum wave height, the maximum run-up level and the peak overtopping volume, then Pullen & Allsop [2003] suggest the use of 1,000 waves or more, and Kortenhaus et al [2004b] recommend that the number of waves should certainly exceed 1,000, and should preferably be greater than 2,000. If armor stability is to be determined, Matsumi et al [2004] propose a minimum of 600 incident random waves, despite the fact that the most common value in the literature is 1,000, as noted by Wolters [2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation