Buruli Ulcer 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11114-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer: Challenges and Future Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has enabled early treatment and improved patient outcomes and passive surveillance towards the control and elimination in endemic countries. Buruli ulcer, the debilitating skin-eating infection, can now be treated more effectively, and the prospects for new RDTs and point of care tests [ 11 ] would enhance early diagnosis and improved treatment outcomes for patients, and mapping towards control activities. However, for many NTDs, their control, elimination, and post-elimination surveillance require diagnostics with better performance, and the unmet diagnostic needs and lack of investment represent significant challenges in achieving these goals.…”
Section: Funding For Ntd Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has enabled early treatment and improved patient outcomes and passive surveillance towards the control and elimination in endemic countries. Buruli ulcer, the debilitating skin-eating infection, can now be treated more effectively, and the prospects for new RDTs and point of care tests [ 11 ] would enhance early diagnosis and improved treatment outcomes for patients, and mapping towards control activities. However, for many NTDs, their control, elimination, and post-elimination surveillance require diagnostics with better performance, and the unmet diagnostic needs and lack of investment represent significant challenges in achieving these goals.…”
Section: Funding For Ntd Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory tests routinely used for confirmation of clinical diagnosis include primarily the microscopic detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and M. ulcerans-specific PCR tests. While microscopy-the only diagnostic test that can currently be performed routinely at hospital level-has limited sensitivity, PCR detecting the insertion sequence IS2404 is highly sensitive and specific [13]. However, PCR requires sophisticated laboratory infrastructure and well-trained personnel and is not reliable without strict quality control [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In resource-poor BU endemic countries, the test is only available at a few reference centres, which poses major logistical problems. Therefore, there is urgent need for a simple and rapid diagnostic test for BU that can be performed at local hospital level or in the field [ 13 ]. Mycolactone represents an ideal target for such an assay, since it seems to be unique to M .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the wide spectrum of BU disease manifestations and the high prevalence of skin conditions with similar presentations (particularly in tropical BU endemic regions), the clinical diagnosis of BU is not always straightforward. PCR tests targeting the IS2404 element of M. ulcerans are currently the gold standard for laboratory diagnosis of BU [7]. Swab samples from ulcers and fine needle aspirates from closed lesions are used for laboratory testing.…”
Section: Diagnosis In Reference Laboratories and At The Point Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good understanding of the mechanisms of immune evasion is of key importance for the development of vaccines, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and efficient treatment regimens. Both leprosy and BU patients develop early skin symptoms, often overlooked by patients and misdiagnosed by untrained clinicians [7,8]. Lack of point of care diagnostic tests often hinders diagnosis in early disease stages, which is crucial to prevent the disabling and stigmatizing long-term effects Katharina Röltgen, Gerd Pluschke, John Stewart Spencer, Patrick Joseph Brennan and Charlotte Avanzi contributed equally to this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%