2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory column experiments and transport modeling to evaluate retardation of uranium in an aquifer downgradient of a uranium in-situ recovery site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the perfect inverse correlation of log β and S sorp , the latter parameter was fixed in all simulations to be 60.2 mmol/kg-sediment, a value estimated from the product of sediment-specific surface area measurements and literature values of uranium sorption densities per unit area. Prior estimates of SRH sediment specific surface area ranged from 3.9 to 13.1 m 2 /g, and uranium sorption site densities for quartz have been reported at 4.81 and 5.1 sites/nm 2 , , producing S sorp estimates that range from 23.7 mmol/kg-sediment to 96.7 mmol/kg-sediment, with a mean value of 60.2 mmol/kg-sediment. We recognize that many sorption sites on aquifer sediments (and almost all of those at which reduction likely occurred) would likely not be associated with quartz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the perfect inverse correlation of log β and S sorp , the latter parameter was fixed in all simulations to be 60.2 mmol/kg-sediment, a value estimated from the product of sediment-specific surface area measurements and literature values of uranium sorption densities per unit area. Prior estimates of SRH sediment specific surface area ranged from 3.9 to 13.1 m 2 /g, and uranium sorption site densities for quartz have been reported at 4.81 and 5.1 sites/nm 2 , , producing S sorp estimates that range from 23.7 mmol/kg-sediment to 96.7 mmol/kg-sediment, with a mean value of 60.2 mmol/kg-sediment. We recognize that many sorption sites on aquifer sediments (and almost all of those at which reduction likely occurred) would likely not be associated with quartz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uranium sorption was simulated by incorporating a nonelectrostatic, generalized composite surface complexation model (GC SCM) with up to three types of sorption sites in the transport calculations . Briefly, the GC SCM is a semiempirical approach in which it is assumed that the surface composition of the mineral assemblage is inherently too complex to be quantified in terms of the contributions of individual phases to adsorption. , Instead, it is assumed that the adsorptive reactivity of the surface can be described by surface complexation equilibria written with “generic” surface functional groups, with sorption coefficients and site densities for each reaction determined by matching experimental data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simon et al [31] conducted a batch test and column leaching experiment and then calibrated the reaction-transport parameters for in situ mining using the geochemical code CHESS and the hydrodynamic geological code HYTEC. Dangelmayr et al [32] studied the decay process of uranium under a certain hydraulic gradient via column leaching experimentation and the PHREEQC model. Gomez et al [33] simulated uranium migration in underground water and obtained the reduction conditions of secondary uranium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%