2017
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0001391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory Calibration of Impact Plates for Measuring Gravel Bed Load Size and Mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the signal recorded by a given plate for a given bedload particle can differ depending on the particle’s trajectory, which notably depends on surrounding flow conditions, as for example water discharge, flow velocity, and bed roughness [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 52 , 53 ]. For example, Kuhnle et al [ 51 ] experimentally tested an acoustic sensor very similar to the SPG system, using a steel plate with similar dimensions but an accelerometer sensor instead of a geophone sensor [ 43 ]. They found that the mass of a grain impacting the plate is related with a power law to the maximum amplitude A max of the signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, the signal recorded by a given plate for a given bedload particle can differ depending on the particle’s trajectory, which notably depends on surrounding flow conditions, as for example water discharge, flow velocity, and bed roughness [ 39 , 40 , 41 , 52 , 53 ]. For example, Kuhnle et al [ 51 ] experimentally tested an acoustic sensor very similar to the SPG system, using a steel plate with similar dimensions but an accelerometer sensor instead of a geophone sensor [ 43 ]. They found that the mass of a grain impacting the plate is related with a power law to the maximum amplitude A max of the signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could result in a better understanding of the relationship between the signal recorded by the plate and the actual mass of bedload in transport, and may reduce the need for collection of large calibration samples. Finally, recent research aimed to identify bedload particle size classes using acoustic sensors, based on the maximum amplitude of the signal [ 40 , 43 ]. By developing an impact experiment that covers the range of maximum amplitude produced by mixed-size particles during natural bedload transport events, the results presented in this paper contribute to the effort made towards a grain-size identification of bedload transport using the SPG system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, underwater microphones (Geay et al, 2017;Thorne, 1986) and seismometers located near the stream channel (Dietze et al, 2019;Gimbert et al, 2019;Roth et al, 2016) record the self-generated noise produced by the interparticle collisions of moving bedload material. On the other hand, devices such as the Japanese pipe microphone (Mizuyama et al, 2010a(Mizuyama et al, , 2010bMao et al, 2016) and the impact plate system, equipped either with a microphone, a piezoelectric sensor, or a geophone (e.g., Hilldale et al, 2015;Koshiba et al, 2018;Krein et al, 2008;Kuhnle et al, 2017;Raven et al, 2010;Rickenmann & McArdell, 2007;Wyss et al, 2016a) record the noise produced by the elastic impact of particles on a metallic structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plates were set to record over 2.5-min intervals with a maximum frequency of 5 Hz to reduce the effect of multiple counts from rolling particles. While seismic sensor recordings vary as a function of particle impact location, shape, size, mode of transport, and energy transmitted to the plate (summarized by Wyss et al, 2016a), a growing body of calibration data confirms that impacts provide a reasonable estimate of particle transport (e.g., Barrière et al, 2015;Kuhnle et al, 2017;Wyss et al, 2016aWyss et al, , 2016bWyss et al, , 2016c.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%