Cold Regions Engineering 2002
DOI: 10.1061/40621(254)88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and Field Investigations of Low Temperature Microbial Activity in Rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other part of the microbiome was found to be significantly affected by temperature (sensitive group: SG), which mainly included Deinococcota, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Myxococcota, Spirochaetota, Acidobateriota, Planctomycetota, Desulfobacterota, Cyanobacteria, and Bdellovibrionota. The difference in the microbial SG in the two temperature-based GDM-UF systems might be due to the different dissolved oxygen (DO) level, as has been reported previously . The DO concentrations at 4 and 25 °C were 13.40 ± 0.16 and 8.3 ± 0.05 mg/L (Figure S2), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other part of the microbiome was found to be significantly affected by temperature (sensitive group: SG), which mainly included Deinococcota, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, Myxococcota, Spirochaetota, Acidobateriota, Planctomycetota, Desulfobacterota, Cyanobacteria, and Bdellovibrionota. The difference in the microbial SG in the two temperature-based GDM-UF systems might be due to the different dissolved oxygen (DO) level, as has been reported previously . The DO concentrations at 4 and 25 °C were 13.40 ± 0.16 and 8.3 ± 0.05 mg/L (Figure S2), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The difference in the microbial SG in the two temperature-based GDM-UF systems might be due to the different dissolved oxygen (DO) level, as has been reported previously. 53 The DO concentrations at 4 and 25 °C were 13.40 ± 0.16 and 8.3 ± 0.05 mg/ L (Figure S2), respectively. The stability of the microbial IG was attributed to the richness (Figure 5b,c) and stress resistance of microorganisms at the genus level (LT, Limnohabitans, Deinocococcus, Diaphorobacter, and Pseudomonas; HT, Rhodobacter) (Figure 7c).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%