2000
DOI: 10.1002/1526-4998(200010)56:10<855::aid-ps216>3.0.co;2-#
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and field evaluation of spinosad against the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar

Abstract: The toxicity of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad was tested against the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Bioassays using red oak leaf disks, treated with spinosad in a Potter spray tower, yielded an LC 50 value of 0.0015 mg AIcm À2 (3-day exposure; 13-day evaluation; 2nd instar larvae). Applied to foliage to run-off in the laboratory (potted red oak seedlings) and the ®eld (4 m-tall birch trees), spinosad effectively controlled 2nd instar larvae at concentrations ranging from 3 to 50 mg litre À1 . Toxic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(11 reference statements)
1
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, spinosad does not kill insects rapidly (Adán et al 1996, Brunner and Doerr 1996, Wanner et al 2000, and therefore, damage was caused probably by P. interpunctella larvae before they died. The lack of signiÞcant numbers of live or dead insects in pouches, and failure to detect consistent differences in insect numbers or kernel damage among treatments, suggest that the use of pouches is undesirable for determining the protective effect of spinosad in farm-stored grain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, spinosad does not kill insects rapidly (Adán et al 1996, Brunner and Doerr 1996, Wanner et al 2000, and therefore, damage was caused probably by P. interpunctella larvae before they died. The lack of signiÞcant numbers of live or dead insects in pouches, and failure to detect consistent differences in insect numbers or kernel damage among treatments, suggest that the use of pouches is undesirable for determining the protective effect of spinosad in farm-stored grain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinosad has been shown to be an effective pest control agent (Brickle et al 2001), particularly for control of Lepidopteran insect pests (Wanner et al 2000). It was reported by Galvan et al (2005) that spinosad decreased the survival of first instars, extended the time it took first instars to become adults, decreased weight gain, and reduced the fertility of female Harmonia axyridis.…”
Section: Activity Of Sublethal Concentrations Of Spinosadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms involved in the observed weight recovery of A. ipsilon larave exposed to sublethal doses of spinosad, and the potential long-term consequences on the insect fitness warrant further consideration. Wanner, Helson, and Harris (2000) studied the knockdown effect of spinosad on the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) and demonstrated a possible paralysis recovery. They established that surface contact exposure to spinosad generates a dose-dependent development of paralysis in second instar larvae and that some temporary recovery can occur at low doses when the insect can feed.…”
Section: Lethal Doses and Lethal Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%