2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laboratory and field assessment of the capacitance sensors Decagon 10HS and 5TE for estimating the water content of irrigated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the study presented, specific soil calibrations were not conducted; instead, the Decagon in‐house calibration for mineral soils was used. The accuracy range of ±1 unit of dielectric permittivity in ranges from 1 to 40 (soil range) and subsequently ±0.03 m 3 /m 3 VWC or ±3% VWC for soils with <10 dS/m (DecagonDevices, ; Visconti et al ., ) seemed sufficient for detecting trends throughout the sediment sequences and for correlation purposes intended in this study where contrast is the most essential factor. VWC is expressed as volume fraction: m 3 water per m 3 soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the study presented, specific soil calibrations were not conducted; instead, the Decagon in‐house calibration for mineral soils was used. The accuracy range of ±1 unit of dielectric permittivity in ranges from 1 to 40 (soil range) and subsequently ±0.03 m 3 /m 3 VWC or ±3% VWC for soils with <10 dS/m (DecagonDevices, ; Visconti et al ., ) seemed sufficient for detecting trends throughout the sediment sequences and for correlation purposes intended in this study where contrast is the most essential factor. VWC is expressed as volume fraction: m 3 water per m 3 soil.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Decagon states the error margin at ±1 unit of apparent dielectric permittivity in ranges from 1 to 40 (soil range) and ±0.03 m 3 /m 3 VWC or ±3% VWC for soils with <10 dS/m (DecagonDevices, ). At this point it must be noted, however, that the accurate measurement of water content via dielectric methods is extremely complex and refinement of these methods including (soil specific) calibration equations and mixing models present an extensive area of research that is of particular importance in precision agriculture (Jacobsen & Schjønning, ; Roth, Malicki, & Plagge, ; Topp et al ., ; Tran, Ardekani, & Lambot, ; Visconti et al ., ; Wang & Schmugge, ). Temperature, salinity, bulk density and clay content as well as sensor technology used influence the estimation of water content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most capacitance sensors use the manufacturer's calibration equations to convert readings to volumetric water content. Clay content, organic matter, salinity, bulk density, and temperature can affect the accuracy of capacitance sensors [36][37][38][39][40]. The effect of these factors on water content readings can vary in different soil types.…”
Section: Limitations Of Soil Moisture Sensors For Irrigation Schedulimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cylindrical core sampler 12 cm in diameter and 6 cm in height was used to collect these undisturbed samples. The 0.5 height/diameter ratio of the cylinder used in this work prevented most of the usual soil compaction that usually occurs when using cylinders with a larger height/diameter ratio (Visconti et al 2014). …”
Section: Soil Samplingmentioning
confidence: 97%