2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0022109010000645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor Unions, Operating Flexibility, and the Cost of Equity

Abstract: We study whether the constraints on firms’ operations imposed by labor unions affect firms’ costs of equity. The cost of equity is significantly higher for firms in more unionized industries. This effect holds after controlling for several industry and firm characteristics, is robust to endogeneity concerns, and is not driven by omitted variables. Moreover, the unionization premium is stronger when unions face a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
172
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 381 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
5
172
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher labor adjustment costs reduces operating flexibility, hence increases the cost of equity. Consistent with this argument, Chen et al (2011) show that firms from highly unionized industries are penalized by a higher cost of equity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher labor adjustment costs reduces operating flexibility, hence increases the cost of equity. Consistent with this argument, Chen et al (2011) show that firms from highly unionized industries are penalized by a higher cost of equity.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Consistent with this point of view, Chen, Kacperczyk, and Ortiz-Molina (2012) show that strong labor union is associated with a lower cost of debt. Furthermore, Chen, Kacperczyk, and Ortiz-Molina, (2011) examine the impact of labor union on the cost of equity. Strong labor protection is associated with higher labor adjustment costs (e.g., Serfling, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we apply lagged values of unionization as an instrument to the current unionization level to obtain exogenous variation in unionization, we find that the economic impact of import penetration on the future unionization rate is −1.88 and statistically significant. 8 In the third and fourth column of Table 2, we find that the impact of import penetration originating from other-wage countries (OWPEN) on unionization rate change is one-third that of low-wage countries, suggesting that imports from low-wage countries have distinct effects. In the last two columns of Table 2, we replicate the main specification using penetrations measures based on imports originating from India and China only.…”
Section: Empirical Design and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Mishel [10] shows that union wage gains are greatest where pricing power enhances employers' ability to pay and where unions achieve high coverage, practice centralize bargaining, and avoid union fragmentation. Chen, Kacperczyk and Ortiz-Molina [8] contend that unions, especially the powerful ones, substantially reduce operating flexibility because they make labor wages more sticky and layoffs more costly. The channel that this may work through may take various forms.…”
Section: Labor Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation