2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2497823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor Unions and Corporate Financial Leverage: The Bargaining Device versus Crowding-out Hypotheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Form 5500 data sets are available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/public-disclosure/ foia/form-5500-datasets. This data set has been used in previous studies (Woods et al 2019). 7.…”
Section: Research Design Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Form 5500 data sets are available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/public-disclosure/ foia/form-5500-datasets. This data set has been used in previous studies (Woods et al 2019). 7.…”
Section: Research Design Data and Sample Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the firm may strategically increase its leverage to improve its bargaining position towards labor unions, since the latter would be less able to extract rents from future cash flows that are already committed to debt holders (see Bronars and Deere, 1991;Dasgupta and Sengupta, 1993;Perotti and Spier, 1993;Matsa, 2010;Myers and Saretto, 2016). On the other hand, the firm may choose to increase its financial flexibility, and hence decrease its leverage, to offset the reduction in its operating flexibility due to unionization (see Gamba and Triantis, 2008;Simintzi et al, 2015;Woods et al, 2019). More generally, unions are expected to favor and promote financial policies that reduce the likelihood of default, inducing managers to choose lower financial leverage so as to reduce employees' exposure to unemployment risk and avoid the loss of firm-specific human capital, wages, and pension benefits (Berk et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%