2018
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor Supply Factors and Economic Fluctuations

Abstract: We propose a new Vector Autoregressive identification scheme that enables us to disentangle labor supply shocks from wage bargaining shocks. Identification is achieved by imposing sign restrictions on the responses of the unemployment rate and the labor force participation rate to the two shocks. According to our analysis on United States data over the period 1985–2014, labor supply shocks and wage bargaining shocks are important drivers of output and unemployment both in the short run and in the long run. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wage bargaining shock is defined as a shock that generates countercyclical dynamics in real wages and in the participation rate. These restrictions find strong theoretical support in a New Keynesian model with search and matching frictions and endogenous labor force participation, as discussed in Foroni, Furlanetto and Lepetit (2015), but also in the model of unemployment proposed by Galí, Smets and Wouters (2011). Notice that, as already mentioned in the Introduction, Norway is the ideal laboratory to study wage bargaining shocks given its highly centralized system of wage negotiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wage bargaining shock is defined as a shock that generates countercyclical dynamics in real wages and in the participation rate. These restrictions find strong theoretical support in a New Keynesian model with search and matching frictions and endogenous labor force participation, as discussed in Foroni, Furlanetto and Lepetit (2015), but also in the model of unemployment proposed by Galí, Smets and Wouters (2011). Notice that, as already mentioned in the Introduction, Norway is the ideal laboratory to study wage bargaining shocks given its highly centralized system of wage negotiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Our main results are confirmed in that extended set-up for which the estimation is more computationally intensive. 5 An important role for labor supply factors in VAR models estimated on US data has been found by Shapiro and Watson (1988), Chang and Schorfheide (2003) and Foroni, Furlanetto and Lepetit (2015). Those shocks are supposed to capture mainly demographic factors, but alternative interpretations have been discussed recently in the literature (cf.…”
Section: Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These changes correspond in the data with innovations in labor law, judicial decisions, and, more generally, the social climate regarding collective bargaining. Also, shocks to the minimum wage and unemployment benefits are, to first order, equivalent to bargaining power shocks (Foroni et al, 2017). As we will see, the steady-state capital income is mostly pinned down by deep parameters other than the bargaining power.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ravenna and Walsh (2011) relate bargaining shocks to the design of optimal monetary policy. Foroni et al (2017) have presented VAR evidence of the importance of bargaining supply shocks in employment fluctuations. Ríos-Rull and Santaeulàlia-Llopis (2010) interpret redistribution shocks as technological shocks to the production function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%