Labor Market Regulations: What do we know about their Impacts in Developing Countries?

Abstract

Labor market regulation is a high-profile, and often contentious, area of public policy. Although these regulations have been studied most extensively in developed countries, there is a growing body of literature on their effects in developing countries. This paper reviews that literature and focuses on the impacts of two important types of labor market regulation, minimum wages and employment protection legislation (EPL), on employment, earnings, and productivity. Strong and opposing views exist regarding the costs and benefits of these regulations, but the results of this review suggest that their impacts are generally smaller than the heat of the debates would suggest. Efficiency effects are found sometimes, but not always, and the effects can be in either direction and are usually modest. The distributional impacts of both minimum wage and employment protection legislation are clearer, with two effects predominating: an equalizing effect among covered workers, but with groups such as youth, women, and the less skilled disproportionately outside the coverage and its benefits. Although the overall conclusion is one of modest effects in most cases, the policy implication is not that these regulations do not matter. On the one hand, both minimum wages and EPL can affect distributional objectives. On the other hand, these regulations can generate undesirable economic or social impacts if they are established or operate in ways that exacerbate the labor market imperfections that they were designed to address. JEL codes: J08, J38, J58, J88 Labor market regulation is a contentious area of public policy debate in many developing countries. To inform this debate, this paper reviews the evidence on the impacts of two important types of labor market regulation: minimum wages and employment protection legislation (EPL). This paper aims to make two contributions to

Application of job security laws, workers’ bargaining power and employment outcomes in India

“…Gordon Betcherman (2014: 12), conducting a comprehensive review of theoretical studies, concluded that ‘[e]conomic theory does not lead to clear predictions about the employment effects of (EPL) [employment protection law]’. In this section, I will outline the basic reasoning underpinning the post-Keynesian and new institutional arguments that have contested the neoclassical position that increased protection dampens employment creation, and draw attention to some empirical research that supports these claims.…”

Why Has Brazil Stopped Growing? Reverberation about the Brazilian Crisis

“…Other issues, such as high tax burdens, confused labor laws that imprison the relationship between companies and workers are among some problems the government needs to handle (Betcherman, 2014;De Moura & Barreira, 2015).…”

Estimating the Short Run Effects of South Africa's Employment Tax Incentive on Youth Employment Probabilities using A Difference‐in‐Differences Approach

“…Betcherman et al . () analyse the Youth Employment Inventory, a database of worldwide youth employment interventions released by the World Bank. 39% of interventions were skills‐based, with subsidies constituting approximately 12% overall.…”