2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1782250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor Market Density and Increasing Returns to Scale: How Strong is the Evidence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is due to Antonio Ciccone and Robert E. Hall (1996), who use state-level data and estimate the effect at 6 percent. This was recently updated by Yu-chin Chen and Noah Weisberger (2007), who use metro-level as well as state-level industry data. These researchers seek to distinguish between agglomeration effects, for which the evidence is robust, and the balance of agglomeration and congestion effects, which the literature refers to as "net increasing returns to scale," for which the evidence is much weaker.…”
Section: The Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is due to Antonio Ciccone and Robert E. Hall (1996), who use state-level data and estimate the effect at 6 percent. This was recently updated by Yu-chin Chen and Noah Weisberger (2007), who use metro-level as well as state-level industry data. These researchers seek to distinguish between agglomeration effects, for which the evidence is robust, and the balance of agglomeration and congestion effects, which the literature refers to as "net increasing returns to scale," for which the evidence is much weaker.…”
Section: The Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%