2016
DOI: 10.1177/0022009416658701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labor Anticommunism in the United States of America and the United Kingdom, 1920–49

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, in the United States and the United Kingdom, welfare provisions have tended to be more minimal and linked to means-testing. In these countries, labor and socialist movements never enjoyed the same level of success as in Northern European countries (Lipset, 1983; Luff, 2018). Governments have been dominated too by right and center parties, although social democratic and leftist parties in the United Kingdom have had more influence than in the United States.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, in the United States and the United Kingdom, welfare provisions have tended to be more minimal and linked to means-testing. In these countries, labor and socialist movements never enjoyed the same level of success as in Northern European countries (Lipset, 1983; Luff, 2018). Governments have been dominated too by right and center parties, although social democratic and leftist parties in the United Kingdom have had more influence than in the United States.…”
Section: Theoretical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%