2022
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2021.3110716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Labeling Self-Tracked Menstrual Health Records With Hidden Semi-Markov Models

Abstract: Globally, millions of women track their menstrual cycle and fertility via smartphone-based health apps, generating multivariate time series with frequent missing data. To leverage this type of data for studies of fertility or studies of the effect of the menstrual cycle on symptoms and diseases, it is critical to have methods for identifying reproductive events, such as ovulation, pregnancy losses or births. Here, we present a hierarchical approach relying on hidden semi-Markov models that adapts to changes in… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Menstrual cycles were identified from bleeding flows reported daily by participants on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (heavy). A hidden semi-Markov model was specified to account for empirically observed distributions of cycle length and bleeding patterns across the menstrual cycle, including spotting between menses [ 46 ]. Data of participants who reported too few days with bleeding (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menstrual cycles were identified from bleeding flows reported daily by participants on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (heavy). A hidden semi-Markov model was specified to account for empirically observed distributions of cycle length and bleeding patterns across the menstrual cycle, including spotting between menses [ 46 ]. Data of participants who reported too few days with bleeding (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Menstrual cycles were identified from bleeding flows reported by participants on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (heavy). Specifically, a hidden semi-Markov model was specified to account for empirically observed distribution of cycle length and bleeding patterns across the menstrual cycle (67). Data of participants who reported too few days with bleeding (i.e., less than 3/70 study days) or too many (i.e., more than 30/70 study days) were excluded from the menstrual cycle analyses.…”
Section: Identification Of Phases Of the Menstrual Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These missing data points were imputed using the same KNN imputation method as for the metabolite KNN imputation. the menstrual cycle, including spotting between menses (55). Data of participants who reported too few days with bleeding (i.e., less than 3/70 study days) or too many (i.e., more than 30/70 study days) were excluded from the menstrual cycle analyses.…”
Section: Cytokine Concentration Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%