2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free quantitative proteomic analysis of pre-flowering PMeV-infected Carica papaya L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, based on the unaltered cross-linking profile upon ligand binding shown in Table 1, major changes in the accessibility is unlikely for these lysine residues. Among a total of 25 cross-links across the entire GPR110 structure, only the cross-linking of K398-K438 in the GAIN domain, and the inter-domain cross-linking of K783-K852 in the intracellular regions, increased significantly after stimulation with synaptamide compared to the case with the OEAor DMSO-treated control (fold-change ≥ 1.5 and p ≤ 0.05) 30,31 . As the accessibility of K398, K438, K783, and presumably K852 remained unchanged, changes in the cross-linking profile for K398-K438 and K783-K852 are most likely due to changes in proximity between the cross-linked pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, based on the unaltered cross-linking profile upon ligand binding shown in Table 1, major changes in the accessibility is unlikely for these lysine residues. Among a total of 25 cross-links across the entire GPR110 structure, only the cross-linking of K398-K438 in the GAIN domain, and the inter-domain cross-linking of K783-K852 in the intracellular regions, increased significantly after stimulation with synaptamide compared to the case with the OEAor DMSO-treated control (fold-change ≥ 1.5 and p ≤ 0.05) 30,31 . As the accessibility of K398, K438, K783, and presumably K852 remained unchanged, changes in the cross-linking profile for K398-K438 and K783-K852 are most likely due to changes in proximity between the cross-linked pairs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1, GPR110overexpressing cells were stimulated with synaptamide for 10 min for GPR110 activation, while DMSO (vehicle) or oleoylethanolamine (OEA), an inactive structural analog of synaptamide, was used in parallel as an unstimulated control 20 . The ligand-induced changes in GPR110 conformation were deduced from comparative analysis of the cross-linked peptides and monolinks using label-free quantitation 30,31 (Table 1, Supplementary Tables 2, 3). A total of 13 monolinks were detected, including K398 and K438 in the GAIN domain, and K783 at TM6.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Latin-America, proteomics is less addressed; basically, the country that is leading the research studies on structural, expression and functional proteomics in plant-virus interactions is Brazil. Some examples of researches conducted in Brazil are the study of the chloroplast proteomic profile in Tomato blistering mosaic virus (ToBMV) and Nicotiana benthamiana interaction (Megias et al, 2018), the host proteomic response to Citrus tristeza virus (Dória and Pirovani, 2019) and to the Papaya meleira virus complex (PMeV) (Soares et al, 2017). In Colombia, however, similarly to transcriptomics, proteomics has been little explored.…”
Section: Proteomics To Better Understand Plant-virus Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another comparative proteomic analysis showed that certain proteins, such as enolase, esterase and ADH3, show an essential role in maturation of somatic papaya embryo cells [26]. Recently, a differential proteome of virus-infected pre-flowering C. papaya vs. uninfected plants was published [27]. In our study, we employed an integration of the basic HPLC fractionation and LC–MS/MS approach to identify a total of 2818 differential accumulated proteins (DAPs) of papaya fruit during ripening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%