2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25261-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label-free quantitative evaluation of breast tissue using Spatial Light Interference Microscopy (SLIM)

Abstract: Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women worldwide. The standard histopathology of breast tissue, the primary means of disease diagnosis, involves manual microscopic examination of stained tissue by a pathologist. Because this method relies on qualitative information, it can result in inter-observer variation. Furthermore, for difficult cases the pathologist often needs additional markers of malignancy to help in making a diagnosis, a need that can potentially be met by novel microscopy meth… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(63 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports/ -in cell/tissue biology: ODT (stem cells) 17 , SLIM 14 , Hilbert phase microscopy HPM 18 , transport of intensity equation 19 , Fourier ptychography 20 , quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry QLSI 21,22 , gradient light interference microscopy GLIM 23 , Hilbert-Huang phase microscopy H2PM 24 , flow cytometry 25 ; -in cancer diagnosis: DHM 26 , SLIM 27 , diffraction phase microscopy DPM 28,29 , to name only a representative number of approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…www.nature.com/scientificreports/ -in cell/tissue biology: ODT (stem cells) 17 , SLIM 14 , Hilbert phase microscopy HPM 18 , transport of intensity equation 19 , Fourier ptychography 20 , quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry QLSI 21,22 , gradient light interference microscopy GLIM 23 , Hilbert-Huang phase microscopy H2PM 24 , flow cytometry 25 ; -in cancer diagnosis: DHM 26 , SLIM 27 , diffraction phase microscopy DPM 28,29 , to name only a representative number of approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QPI measures the optical pathlength (OPL) map associated with a sample as an intrinsic contrast mechanism, and, as a result, transparent biospecimens, such as cells and tissues, can be clearly visualized without concerns regarding exogenous staining. In the past decade, this label-free imaging field has quickly expanded and shown remarkable performance in many fields of research, such as cell biology [7][8][9][10], neuroscience [11,12], immunology [13], and more recently, clinical studies [14][15][16][17][18]. Since the OPL is essentially the product of refractive index difference and local thickness, the pixel values of a QPI image are not subject to settings of the instrument (e.g., camera exposure time and illumination intensity), nor the staining intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] By generating contrast, label-free QPI lends itself much more readily to automated image analysis than bright-field microscopy, since stain variation is no longer an issue. 13 In addition to the advantages of label-free imaging, the contrast mechanism in QPI provides access to additional markers of disease, which are of value to histopathology. 14,25 In particular, since QPI systems employ interferometric measurements, they are sensitive to subwavelength fluctuations in OPD in both space and time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%