2023
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202205519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label‐Free Identification of Exosomes using Raman Spectroscopy and Machine Learning

Abstract: Exosomes, nano‐sized extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted from cells, carry various cargo molecules reflecting their cells of origin. As EV content, structure, and size are highly heterogeneous, their classification via cargo molecules by determining their origin is challenging. Here, a method is presented combining surface‐enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) with machine learning algorithms to employ the classification of EVs derived from five different cell lines to reveal their cellular origins. Using an ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 154 ] More recently, Raman spectroscopy has been combined with machine learning algorithms to identify EVs from five different cell lines. [ 155 ] Thus, Raman spectroscopy might be suitable to reveal differences in EV loading. Another approach could be atomic force microscopy (AFM).…”
Section: Determining the Loading Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 154 ] More recently, Raman spectroscopy has been combined with machine learning algorithms to identify EVs from five different cell lines. [ 155 ] Thus, Raman spectroscopy might be suitable to reveal differences in EV loading. Another approach could be atomic force microscopy (AFM).…”
Section: Determining the Loading Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…103 The most commonly used machine learning methods are PCA-LDA, PC-DFA, and PCA&OPLS-DA. [104][105][106] In addition, the composition and structure of the SERS substrate have a more significant impact on the effectiveness of the detection in label-free SERS detection than in labeled SERS detection. Currently, commonly used substrates are solidphase and sol-gels composed of gold or silver NPs.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SERS signals of individual cells are not very distinct and characteristic fingerprint peaks are not obvious, so it is often necessary to combine machine learning methods to improve the sensitivity and accuracy of the test 103 . The most commonly used machine learning methods are PCA‐LDA, PC‐DFA, and PCA&OPLS‐DA 104–106 . In addition, the composition and structure of the SERS substrate have a more significant impact on the effectiveness of the detection in label‐free SERS detection than in labeled SERS detection.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, to improve the rigor and reproducibility in this growing field, a rapid, label-free, and transparent method of assessing the relative amounts of serum supplement-derived EVs within EV preparations from cell cultures would be ideal. While a few recent studies have made progress in using Raman spectroscopy-based methods to quantify the purity of EVs or determine the relative ratios of different EV or lipoprotein subpopulations, no system has presented a robust and sufficiently advanced analytical method which enables explainable interpretation [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%