2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.09.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Label free electrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of ractopamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table , Table S2, and Table , it can be seen that there is only one β-agonist (CL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table , four β-agonists (CL, SAL, RAC, and TUL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table S2, and six β-agonists (CL, SAL, RAC, TER, MAB, and TUL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table , which shows that the multiresidue detection performance of the GCE/GNP/RAC immunosensor is better than those of GCE/GNP/SAL and GCE/GNP/CL immunosensors. The three multiresidue immunosensors based on the anti-BSA-RAC-CL-SAL antibody manifest outstanding performance with a wide linear range and low detection limit, compared with the previous different material-modified electrodes for RAC detection, for example, Au/OMC/GCE (detection limit 1.49 ng·mL –1 ), 3D MnO 2 /RGO@nickel foam (detection limit 3.92 ng·mL –1 ), ATONPs/CNTs/GCE (detection limit 1.11 ng·mL –1 ), and MCF/CPE (detection limit 3.38 ng·mL –1 ), which can be ascribed to the high specific area of the GCE/GNP/β-agonist (RAC, CL, or SAL) caused by the nanoscale effect of the graphene, increasing the loading capacity of the β-agonists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From Table , Table S2, and Table , it can be seen that there is only one β-agonist (CL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table , four β-agonists (CL, SAL, RAC, and TUL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table S2, and six β-agonists (CL, SAL, RAC, TER, MAB, and TUL) with a detection limit of 0.1 ng·mL –1 in Table , which shows that the multiresidue detection performance of the GCE/GNP/RAC immunosensor is better than those of GCE/GNP/SAL and GCE/GNP/CL immunosensors. The three multiresidue immunosensors based on the anti-BSA-RAC-CL-SAL antibody manifest outstanding performance with a wide linear range and low detection limit, compared with the previous different material-modified electrodes for RAC detection, for example, Au/OMC/GCE (detection limit 1.49 ng·mL –1 ), 3D MnO 2 /RGO@nickel foam (detection limit 3.92 ng·mL –1 ), ATONPs/CNTs/GCE (detection limit 1.11 ng·mL –1 ), and MCF/CPE (detection limit 3.38 ng·mL –1 ), which can be ascribed to the high specific area of the GCE/GNP/β-agonist (RAC, CL, or SAL) caused by the nanoscale effect of the graphene, increasing the loading capacity of the β-agonists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…They are usually selected from a combinatorial DNA library by systematic evolution of ligands exponential enrichment (SELEX) technology for binding to target analyte through folding into specific 3D-structures [ 34 , 53 ]. Aptamers possess a remarkable ability to interact with a wide range of molecular targets with high selectivity [ 54 ]. Unlike antibodies, aptamers are of low cost and easy to prepare with reproducible synthesis and exhibit high chemical and thermal stability with no significant toxicity [ 55 ].…”
Section: Electrochemical Aptasensors Based On Carbon Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, an aptasensor has been considered as a desirable alternative for developing cancer biosensors. An aptasensor shows various advantages such as low cost, high affinity, obvious simplicity, and good chemical stability. Especially, an electrochemical aptasensor has drawn considerable attention owing to its inherent advantages: (i) an electrochemical aptasensor shows high sensitivity and rapid response, which meets the requirement of rapid monitoring; (ii) electrochemical response can be measured without using labels (i.e., label-free detection), and in this process, the operating cost is reduced through relatively simple operation steps; , and (iii) an electrochemical aptasensor can be effectively miniaturized and integrated with lab-on-chip equipment. Thus, the portability of the sensing platform can be greatly improved. However, the sensing performance of electrochemical aptasensors relies heavily on the interface materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%