La voz de la comunidad en la preparación de un megaevento: Río 2016

Sebastião, Sónia Pedro; Lemos, Ana Isabel

doi:10.7764/cdi.39.679

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, in order to have all that infrastructure built, thousands of people were displaced and this is a negative impact. She also mentions that Legacies of the 2016 Olympic Games: Perception of Public Policies Researchers on Sport and Leisure decision-making or as a spectator, volunteer, among others) can produce negative aspects in people's perception, even generating aversion to the event 18,31,19,28,26 . Table 4 below presents the main negative social impacts from Rio 2016 in the opinion of the interviewees.…”

Section: Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The sports megaevents in Brazil were marked by political and social conflicts that resulted in public demonstrations, in which more investments were demanded in some areas, such as health, education, safety, transportation and lower tariffs, and also criticizing the sport megaevents, emphasizing the high public spending for their realization 17,22,[26][27][28][29] .…”

Section: Social Mobilizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interviewee D presents the participation, involvement and passion of Brazilian fans as a positive impact of the 2016 Olympic Games. Adherence and popular participation in sports megaevents seem to be positive when they happen 29,30,31,26 , and the opposite of that also occurs, that is, the lack of consensus and popular participation (in its various forms, whether in the homeless, prostitutes, who will be conflicting with the government vision of the modern city open to tourism.…”

Section: Involvement Of the Brazilian Supportersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Legacies of the 2016 Olympic Games: Perception of Public Policies Researchers on Sport and Leisure

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sports megaevents generate both positive and negative impacts to the host nation, and it is fundamental that the country have elements and research to have a base for the public policies construction of sports and leisure, aimed at broadening the positive impacts and reducing the negative ones which stem from such events. The objectives of this research were: to identify and analyze the meanings and positive and negative social impacts of Olympic Games Rio 2016 for public policies researchers of sports and leisure. Bibliographic and field research were used as methodological procedures and this is a qualitative study. The field research was carried out with 10 Brazilian public policies researchers of sports and leisure. The main positive social impact was the sport itself. The main negative impact mentioned was related to the absence of legacy for the sport. The interviewees also mentioned as positive and negative impact the infrastructure created in function of the sports megaevents. For researchers, the creation and / or improvement of the city structure and the host country can improve people's lives: access to means of transport and the right to sports and leisure. However, factors such as high costs and works over-billing, the removal of people, corruption and lack of actions that allow access to the spaces and equipment built are pointed out as negative by the researchers regarding the infrastructure. Keywords: Sports. Public Policy. Leisure Activities. Culture. Resumo Os megaeventos esportivos geram impactos positivos e negativos para o país anfitrião, sendo fundamental que o país sede tenha elementos e pesquisas para ter uma base para a construção de políticas públicas de esporte e lazer, visando ampliar os impactos positivos e reduzir os impactos negativos que decorrem de tais eventos. Os objetivos desta pesquisa foram identificar e analisar os impactos sociais positivos e negativos dos Jogos Olímpicos 2016 para pesquisadores de políticas públicas de esporte e lazer. Pesquisa bibliográfica e de campo foram utilizadas como procedimentos metodológicos e trata-se de um estudo qualitativo. A pesquisa de campo foi realizada com 10 pesquisadores brasileiros de políticas públicas de esporte e lazer. O principal impacto social positivo foi o próprio esporte. O principal impacto negativo mencionado foi relacionado à ausência de legado para o esporte. Os entrevistados também mencionaram como impacto positivo e negativo a infraestrutura criada em função dos megaeventos esportivos. Para os pesquisadores, a criação e / ou melhoria da estrutura da cidade e do país hospedeiro pode melhorar a vida das pessoas: acesso a meios de transporte e direito ao esporte e lazer. No entanto, fatores como altos custos e excesso de faturamento das obras, afastamento de pessoas, corrupção e falta de ações que permitam o acesso aos espaços e equipamentos construídos são apontados como negativos pelos pesquisadores em relação à infraestrutura. Palavras-chave: Esportes. Política Pública. Atividades de Lazer. Cultura.

show abstract

Section: Infrastructurementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Social Mobilizationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Involvement Of the Brazilian Supportersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Legacies of the 2016 Olympic Games: Perception of Public Policies Researchers on Sport and Leisure

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The portrayal of non-western sports hosts in International Media: A comparative analysis of BBC, Al Jazeera English, and RT's coverage of the 2022 FIFA World Cup

Abdul Rehman,

Jebril

2023

International Communication Gazette

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyses news coverage of Qatar's hosting of the 2022 World Cup by three global news websites – Al Jazeera English (AJE), BBC World News, and RT English – over a period of nine years leading up to the tournament. Except for AJE, which focused on infrastructure development and political issues, the media outlets prioritised critical concerns by highlighting the social problems faced by migrant workers, while local community issues were given less attention. Although migrant workers received substantial media coverage, they were the least cited on all three news websites. Official sources were preferred to unofficial and public sources, and international sources were cited more often than Qatari sources. The most commonly used frame was conflict, whereas the human interest frame was the least utilised. These findings are discussed in light of the debate on the international coverage of hosting mega sport events in non-Western societies.

show abstract

La voz de la comunidad en la preparación de un megaevento: Río 2016

Cited by 2 publications

References 19 publications

Legacies of the 2016 Olympic Games: Perception of Public Policies Researchers on Sport and Leisure

Legacies of the 2016 Olympic Games: Perception of Public Policies Researchers on Sport and Leisure

The portrayal of non-western sports hosts in International Media: A comparative analysis of BBC, Al Jazeera English, and RT's coverage of the 2022 FIFA World Cup

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About