La utilización de pilares transmucosos definitivos de colocación inmediata

Nicolás-Silvente, Ana I.; Rivas-Pérez, Ana; Garcia-Lopez, Rabindranath; Alemán-Marín, J; Chiva-García, Fernando; Sánchez-Pérez, Arturo

doi:10.4321/s0213-12852020000200006

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As it was considered inevitable, little attention was paid [1]. Repeated disconnection and connection of theses abutments result in a negative bone response that manifests as bone loss at the marginal ridge level, accompanied by apical soft tissue migration [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to overcome these problems, prosthetic procedures were modified and the "oneabutment one-time" protocol was introduced. This protocol included the placement of the permanent abutment immediately after implant placement, hereby eliminating the need for multiple implantabutment disconnections [1,11]. As a result, the fragile soft tissue seal around an implant is not disrupted, obtaining stability of soft tissue dimensions [11,12]and marginal bone is expected to be maximally preserved [1,11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations Implant-Supported vs MultiUnit-Supported Restorations, a Finite Element Pilot Study

Anitua,

Díez,

Pesquera Velasco

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant-supported-screw-retained prostheses are really popular. Some of the most frequent complications have been mechanical complications. These include abutment screw loosening or even screw fracture. Using an intermediate abutment can offer several advantages. However, little literature has been found regarding how this affects the mechanical behavior of dental restorations. This study focuses on understanding the mechanical behavior of implant-supported restorations with a transepithelial component compared to those with a direct implant-supported restoration. It was carried out by using the Finite Element Method (FEM) and was experi-mentally validated. The results showed that in the case of transepithelial-supported restoration, the prosthetic screw mounted over the transepithelial component suffers higher stress than the one screwed directly to the implant. After applying a cyclic fatigue load, it is experimentally proven that, in the transepithelial-supported restorations, the fuse changes from being the screw that goes to the implant, to being the upper one. As a conclusion we can say that the use of an intermediate abutment in dental restoration not only provides better protection to the rest of the dental restoration but also allows easier repair in the event of a fracture. This can potentially lead to more efficient procedures and improved patient outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations Implant-Supported vs MultiUnit-Supported Restorations, a Finite Element Pilot Study

Anitua,

Díez,

Pesquera Velasco

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations: A Finite Element Pilot Study of Implant-Supported vs. Multiunit-Supported Restorations

Anitua,

Truchuelo Díez,

Pesquera Velasco

et al. 2024

Prosthesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implant-supported-screw-retained prostheses are highly popular. Some of the most frequent complications are connected with the mechanical properties of the fixing elements. These include abutment screw loosening or even screw fracture. Using an intermediate abutment can offer several advantages. However, few studies detail how this affects the mechanical behavior of dental restorations. This study focuses on understanding the mechanical behavior of implant-supported restorations with a transepithelial component compared to direct implant-supported restoration. It was carried out using the finite element method (FEM) and was experimentally validated. The results showed that in the case of transepithelial-supported restoration, the prosthetic screw mounted over the transepithelial component suffered higher stress than the one screwed directly into the implant. After applying a cyclic fatigue load, it was experimentally proven that, in the transepithelial-supported restorations, the fuse changed from being the screw that went into the implant to being the upper one. In conclusion, we can state that the use of an intermediate abutment in dental restoration not only provides better protection for the rest of the dental restoration but also allows for easier repair in the event of a fracture. This can potentially lead to more efficient procedures and improved patient outcomes.

show abstract

La utilización de pilares transmucosos definitivos de colocación inmediata

Abstract: La utilización de pilares transmucosos definitivos de colocación inmediata The use of immediate placement of definitive transmucosal abutments

Cited by 2 publications

References 23 publications

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations Implant-Supported vs MultiUnit-Supported Restorations, a Finite Element Pilot Study

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations Implant-Supported vs MultiUnit-Supported Restorations, a Finite Element Pilot Study

Mechanical Behavior of Dental Restorations: A Finite Element Pilot Study of Implant-Supported vs. Multiunit-Supported Restorations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About